Research Area: Genetics

Mary Gehring

Education

  • PhD, 2005, University of California, Berkeley
  • BA, 1998, Biology, Williams College

Research Summary

We focus on plant epigenetics — that is, the heritable information that influences cellular function but is not encoded in the DNA sequence itself. We use genetic, genomic and molecular biology approaches to study the fidelity of epigenetic inheritance and the dynamics of epigenomic reprogramming during reproduction, primarily in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. More specifically, we investigate the interplay among repetitive sequences, DNA methylation and chromatin structure in these dynamic processes.

Awards

  • Rosalind Franklin Young Investigator Award, 2013
  • Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, 2011
Troy Littleton

Education

  • PhD, 1994, Baylor College of Medicine; MD, 1997, Baylor College of Medicine
  • BS, 1989, Biochemistry, Louisiana State University

Research Summary

Using Drosophila, we study how neurons form synaptic connections, as well as how synapses transmit information and change during learning and memory. We also investigate how alterations in neuronal signaling underlie several neurological diseases, including epilepsy, autism, and Huntington’s Disease. We hope to bridge the gap between the molecular components of the synapse and the physiological responses they mediate.

Alan D. Grossman

Education

  • PhD, 1984, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • BS, 1979, Biochemistry, Brown University

Research Summary

We use a variety of approaches to investigate several of the fundamental and conserved processes used by bacteria for propagation and growth, adaptation to stresses, and acquisition of new genes and traits via horizontal gene transfer. Our long term goals are to understand many of the molecular mechanisms and regulation underlying basic cellular processes in bacteria. Our organism of choice for these studies is usually the Gram positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.

Our current efforts are focused in two important areas of biology: 1) The control of horizontal gene transfer, specifically the lifecycle, function, and control of integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs). These elements are widespread in bacteria and contribute greatly to the spread of antibiotic resistances between organisms. 2) Regulation of the initiation of DNA replication and the connections between replication and gene expression, with particular focus on the conserved replication initiator and transcription factor DnaA. This work is directly related to mechanisms controlling bacterial growth, survival, and stress responses.

Awards

  • National Academy of Sciences, 2014
  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2008
  • American Academy of Microbiology 1998
  • Eli Lilly Company Research Award, 1997
Retinoic acid regulates transitions in mouse sperm production
November 7, 2017

CAMBRIDGE, MA – Sperm production requires progression through a well-orchestrated series of transitions in the testes that move diploid spermatogonia cells, with two complete sets of chromosomes, through a series of transitions to produce haploid sperm, with one copy of each chromosome, poised to swim and fertilize an available egg. There are four major transitions in sperm production, or spermatogenesis. The first is spermatogonial differentiation, during which spermatogonia differentiate, losing their stem-cell like qualities. The resulting spermatocytes then initiate meiosis and undergo two rounds of cell division to generate haploid spermatids. The spermatids undergo elongation and then the resulting sperm are released.

The signals that control progression through these transitions were poorly understood until 2015, when David Page, Member and Director of Whitehead Institute, professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and investigator with Howard Hughes Medical Institute and colleagues determined that retinoic acid (RA), a derivative of vitamin A that has been shown to play a key role in a number of developmental processes, was responsible for coordinating the first two stages of spermatogenesis-differentiation and meiosis. Now, in a paper published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Page, first author Tsutomu Endo, and colleagues extend those findings to show that RA signaling in mice coordinates the second two transitions as well.

Diagram of model by which retinoic acid coordinates spermatogenesisThe researchers used chemical manipulation of RA levels to determine that RA controlled the second two transitions, spermatid elongation and sperm release, in addition to the first two. With this knowledge in hand, the researchers were then able to drill down and get a better picture of how RA regulates male gamete production. One outstanding question has been how males are able to continually produce sperm throughout their lifetime, in contrast with females whose egg production and maturation is limited. Page and colleagues measured RA levels in the testes and discovered that it is cyclically produced, driving production of sperm during the male lifetime. In addition to the timing of RA production, the researchers also examined its source. From which cells was the RA signal coming? During the first two transitions, they determined that the RA was coming from the somatic Sertoli cells, the support cells of the testes, and in the second two transitions they determined that it was being released by the germ cells themselves-the meiotic (pachytene-stage) spermatocytes were found to be secreting RA to other germ cells in the testes.

These findings not only contribute to our fundamental understanding of male gamete formation, they also provide important clues for the field of reproductive technology. For years, scientists have been working on making gametes in the laboratory, but have had difficulty making functional sperm. This discovery of the role of RA in spermatogenesis adds important tools to the toolbox of assisted reproduction. The work shows that RA is required in both the early and late transitions of spermatogenesis and sheds light on an important component of laboratory efforts for sperm production.

Other researchers involved include Elizaveta Freinkman and Dirk G. de Rooij.

This research was supported by Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) and the United States Department of Defense (DoD W81XWH-15-1-0337)

Written by Lisa Girard
****
David Page’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and a Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 ****
Paper cited: Endo, T et al.  Periodic production of retinoic acid by meiotic and somatic cells coordinates four transitions in mouse spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710837114. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Other work cited: Endo T et al. Periodic retinoic acid-STRA8 signaling intersects with periodic germ-cell competencies to regulate spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505683112. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
A new workflow for natural product characterization comes ashore with red algae
October 30, 2017

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. – A few years ago while paddling off the coast near La Jolla, California, avid surfer Roland Kersten noticed a piece of red algae (Laurenica pacifica) bobbing alongside his surfboard. Kersten, whose background is in natural product chemistry, was intrigued.

Natural products—chemicals from living organisms such as plants and algae—represent a rich source of potential therapeutics. A majority of anti-cancer drugs are natural product-based or inspired. One such well-known natural product—the potent anti-cancer drug Taxol—was identified in the bark of a yew tree.

Marine algae, like the red algae Kersten found, are often rich in compounds called sesquiterpenes, some of which have been shown to have potential medicinal attributes. Since the 1970s, scientists identified many sesquiterpenes produced by Laurencia species with anti-cancer properties. The identification techniques usually required about tens of milligrams of purified compounds, which were obtained from more than a kilogram of algae. Because Laurencia and the reef ecosystems in which it thrives are protected, and such large-scale harvesting for scientific or medicinal purposes is no longer tenable, Kersten had to devise a different approach to analyze its sesquiterpenes.

Kersten received a collection permit to clamber over the rocky shore at deep low tide to collect a hand-sized sample of the red algae. Now a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of Whitehead Member and Massachusetts Institute of Technology assistant professor of biology Jing-Ke Weng, Kersten’s first task was to search the RNA sequences of all genes expressed in his red algae sample to find those whose product seemed likely to be enzymes that make sesquiterpenes.  In order to determine the product generated by these enzymes, he engineered them in yeast and isolated its sesquiterpene products.

In order to define the first step in the biogenesis of sesquiterpenes in red algae, Kersten wanted to see the precise 3-D structure of the isolated sesquiterpene. But the small handful of algae he had obtained produced only a fraction of the amount required for x-ray crystallography, the established method for determining a compound’s absolute structure. So Kersten tried a method recently developed by collaborator Makoto Fujita at the University of Tokyo that requires only a few nanograms of material: soaking extracted compounds into a special crystalline sponge, which supports the sample’s molecular shape while it is bombarded with x-rays to accurately determine the 3-D conformation of a molecule. A new combination of the crystalline sponge method and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy by the Fujita group revealed the structure of prespatane.

With the compound’s structure in hand, Kersten is closer to understanding how Laurenciabiosynthesizes its sesquiterpenes and how to engineer yeast to produce the same molecules for medicinal research at scale—without touching the red algae flourishing on protected reefs. And the novel workflow—spanning genomics, metabolomics, synthetic biology, and x-ray crystallography with crystalline sponges—established by Weng, Kersten, and their collaborators may expedite the identification of other promising compounds produced by organisms from both land and sea.

Other contributors to this work include Shoukou Lee of Tokyo University, Daishi Fujita of Tokyo University and Whitehead Institute, Tomáš Pluskal of Whitehead Institute.  The team also collaborated with researchers from Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Salk Institute of Biological Sciences.

This work was supported by Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Simons Foundation, the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation, the Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences, the Searle Scholars Program, and the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

 Written by Nicole Giese Rura
* * *
Jing-Ke Weng’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also an assistant professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* * *
Full Citation:
“A Red Algal Bourbonane Sesquiterpene Synthase Defined by Microgram-scale NMR-coupled Crystalline Sponge XRD Analysis”
Journal of the American Chemical Society, online October 30, 2017.
Roland D. Kersten (1,6), Shoukou Lee (2,6) , Daishi Fujita (1,2) , Tomáš Pluskal (1) , Susan Kram (3), Jennifer E. Smith (3) , Takahiro Iwai (2) , Joseph P. Noel (4) , Makoto Fujita (2), Jing-Ke Weng (1,5).
1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, United States
2. Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, JST-ACCEL, Tokyo, Japan
3. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Jack H. Skirball Center for Chemical Biology and Proteomics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, United States
5. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
6. These authors contributed equally
Department of Biology hosts its first Science Slam

Eight biology trainees had just three minutes to explain their research and earn favor with the judges and audience in new yearly event.

Raleigh McElvery | Department of Biology
October 5, 2017

Nearly 300 spectators crowded into a lecture hall at the Ray and Maria Stata Center on a recent Tuesday to witness the first annual Science Slam, hosted by MIT’s Department of Biology.

A science slam features a series of short presentations where researchers explain their work in a compelling manner and — as the name suggests — make an impact. The presentations aren’t just talks, they’re performances geared towards a science-literate but non-specialized public audience. In this case, competitors were each given one slide and three minutes to tell their scientific tales and earn votes from audience members and judges.

The jury included Ellen Clegg, editorial page editor of The Boston Globe and co-author of two award-winning books, “ChemoBrain” and “The Alzheimer’s Solution;” Emilie Marcus, CEO of Cell Press and editor-in-chief of the flagship journal, Cell; and Ari Daniel, an independent science reporter who produces digital videos for PBS NOVA and co-produces the Boston branch of Story Collider.

Among the competitors were five graduate students and three postdocs who hailed from labs scattered throughout Building 68, the Whitehead Institute, the Broad Institute, the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory. The storytellers were:

  • Sahin Naqvi, from David Page’s lab, who spoke about the evolution of genetic sex differences in mammals, as well as how these differences impact the likelihood of developing certain diseases based on gender;
  • Sudha Kumari, from Darrell Irvine’s lab, who spoke about her work investigating immune cell interactions — specifically how T cells communicate using physical contact;
  • Deniz Atabay, from Peter Reddien’s lab, who spoke about the ways cells in flatworms self-organize during regeneration to re-form organs, tissues, and even neural circuits;
  • Emma Kowal, from Christopher Burge’s lab, who spoke about her goals to demystify the ways in which certain noncoding regions of genetic sequence, known as introns, contribute to protein production;
  • Xin Tang, from Rudolf Jaenisch’s lab, who spoke about a technique to illuminate the seemingly invisible changes in brain cells that trigger disease, using a glowing enzyme from a firefly;
  • Nicole Aponte, from Troy Littleton’s lab, who spoke about her ability to manipulate brain cell activity in the fruit fly, and study how defects in neuronal connections contribute to developmental disorders;
  • Karthik Shekhar, from Aviv Regev’s lab, who spoke about his efforts to identify and manipulate different types of brain cells, understanding how they assemble into complex networks to facilitate learning, memory, and — in some cases — disease; and
  • Monika Avello, from Alan Grossman’s lab, who spoke about “bacterial sexology,” that is, how and why these organisms choose to block unwanted sexual advances from fellow bacteria.

Vivian Siegel, who oversees the department’s communications efforts, moderated the event. Siegel and the Building 68 communications team joined forces with three members of the Building 68 MIT Postdoctoral Association — Ana Fiszbein, Isabel Nocedal, and Peter Sudmant — to publicize the event and to host two pre-slam workshops, as well as one-on-one training sessions with individual participants.

“Participating in a Science Slam seemed like a great way for our trainees to learn how to communicate to a nonspecialized audience, which is something they will need to be able to do throughout their careers,” Siegel said. “We really wanted to develop a camaraderie among the participants, and bring trainees together from across the department to help each other tell compelling stories about their science.”

Kowal — whose talk was titled “Gone but Not Forgotten: How Do Introns Enhance Gene Expression?”  — ultimately took home both the audience and jury cash prizes. Kowal completed her undergraduate degree in chemical and physical biology at Harvard before coming to MIT for graduate school. Her dream is to write science fiction, so she decided she’d better study science so she’d know what to write about.

“I really enjoyed seeing people get stoked about introns, and the fact that they enhance gene expression,” she said. “It’s a great way to get comfortable explaining your project in a compelling way to a broad audience. Since you’ll probably be telling people about your work for a while, I think it’s a very good use of time to practice doing that.”

New target for treating “undruggable” lung cancer

Drug already in clinical trials may be effective on some aggressive adenocarcinomas.

Becky Ham | MIT News correspondent
October 2, 2017

Mutations in the KEAP1 gene could point the way to treating an aggressive form of lung cancer that is driven by “undruggable” mutations in the KRAS gene, according to a new study by MIT researchers.

KEAP1 mutations occur alongside KRAS mutations in about 17 percent of lung adenocarcinoma cases. Tyler Jacks, director of MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and co-senior author of the study, and his colleagues found that cancer cells with nonfunctioning KEAP1 genes are hungry for glutamine, an amino acid essential for protein synthesis and energy use. Starving these cells of glutamine may thus offer a way to treat cancers with both KRAS and KEAP1 mutations.

Indeed, small-molecule-based inhibitors of glutaminase, an enzyme crucial to glutamine metabolism, slowed cancer cell growth and led to smaller tumors overall in human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines and in tumors in mice with KEAP1 mutations, the researchers found.

The study offers a way to identify lung cancer patients who might respond well to drugs that block the work of glutaminase, says MIT graduate student Rodrigo Romero, a first author on the paper that appears in the Oct. 2 online edition of Nature Medicine.

“All cell lines that we have currently tested that are KEAP1-mutant — independent of their KRAS status — appear to be exquisitely sensitive to glutaminase inhibitors,” says Romero, a graduate student in Jacks’ lab, who participated in the MIT Summer Research Program (MSRP) as an undergraduate.

Hyperactivating the antioxidant response

Lung adenocarcinoma accounts for about 40 percent of U.S. lung cancers, and 15 to 30 percent of those cases contain a KRAS mutation. KRAS has been “notoriously difficult to inhibit” because the usual ways of blocking the KRAS protein’s interactions or interfering with the protein’s targets have fallen short, says Romero.

Lung cancers containing KRAS mutations often harbor other mutations, including KEAP1, which is the third most frequently mutated gene in lung adenocarcinoma. To find out more about how these co-mutations affect lung cancer progression, the MIT research team created KEAP1 mutations in mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma, using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system to target the gene.

The KEAP1 protein normally represses another protein called NRF2, which controls the activation of an antioxidant response that removes toxic, reactive oxygen species from cells. When the researchers disabled KEAP1 with loss-of-function mutations, NRF2 was able to accumulate and contribute to a “hyperactivation” of the antioxidant response.

Lung adenocarcinomas bearing the KEAP1 mutation may “take advantage of this [hyper-activation] to promote cellular growth or detoxify intracellular damaging agents,” Romero says.

In fact, when the researchers examined genes targeted by NRF2 across a sample of human lung adenocarcinoma tumors, they concluded that the expression of these genes was greater in advanced stage IV tumors, and that patients with such “up-regulated” NRF2 tumors had significantly worse survival rates than other lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Tumors hungry for glutamine

Romero and colleagues used CRISPR/Cas9 to learn more about other genetic interactions with KEAP1 mutants. Their screening demonstrated that lung cancer cells with KRAS and KEAP1 loss-of function mutations were more dependent than other cells on increased amounts of glutamine.

To learn whether this glutamine hunger could be a therapeutic vulnerability, the researchers tested two glutaminase inhibitors against the cancer cells, including one compound called CB-839 that is in phase I clinical trials for KRAS-mutant lung cancer. CB-839 slowed growth and kept tumors smaller than normal in lung adenocarcinoma with KEAP1 mutations, the researchers found.

Phase I clinical trials that treat KEAP1-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with a combination of CB-839 and the cancer immunotherapy drug nivolumab (Opdivo) are also underway, says Romero, who notes the MIT study might help identify patients who would be good candidates for these trials.

“There are also many clinical trials testing the efficacy of glutaminase inhibition in a variety of cancer types, independent of KRAS status. However, the results from these studies are still unclear,” Romero says.

Jacks emphasizes that his laboratory has and will continue to study several mutations beyond KEAP1 that may cooperate with KRAS in their mouse models of human lung adenocarcinoma. “The complexity of human cancer can be quite daunting,” he notes. “The genetic tools that we have assembled allow us to create models of many individual subtypes of the disease and in this way begin to define the exploitable vulnerabilities of each. The observed sensitivity of KEAP1 mutant tumors to glutaminase inhibitors is an important example of this approach. There will be more.”

Co-authors on the Nature Medicine paper include former Koch Institute postdoc Thales Papagiannakopoulos, now at New York University, and MIT professor of biology Matthew Vander Heiden. The research was funded by the Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Support Grant, the National Institutes of Health, and the Koch Institute Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Michael Rosbash PhD ’71 shares Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine

MIT alumnus and two others honored for discovering the molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms.

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
October 2, 2017

Michael Rosbash, who earned his PhD from MIT in 1971, will share the 2017 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine, the Nobel Committee announced this morning in Stockholm.

Rosbash, now a professor of biology at Brandeis University, shares the prize with Jeffrey C. Hall of the University of Maine and Michael W. Young of Rockefeller University. The scientists were honored for “their discoveries of molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian rhythm.”

Circadian rhythms help living organisms adapt their biological activities to the normal 24-hour cycle of light and darkness. These rhythms influence behavior, sleep, metabolism, body temperature, and many other biological functions.

In 1984, Rosbash, Hall, and Young isolated a gene that regulates these daily rhythms in fruit flies. This gene, known as period, encodes a protein that accumulates during the night and is degraded during the day. Further work revealed that this protein inhibits the gene that encodes it, creating a negative feedback loop that is key to generating continuous oscillations.

Since then, the three scientists have discovered several other genes necessary for maintaining circadian cycles, and similar processes have been found in many other organisms, including humans.

Rosbash was born in Kansas City, Missouri, but grew up in Newton, Massachusetts. He earned his bachelor’s degree at Caltech before coming to MIT to pursue a PhD in biology. He has been on the faculty at Brandeis since 1974, and he is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and a member of the National Academy of Sciences. In 2013, Rosbash, Hall, and Young shared the Shaw Prize in Life Sciences and Medicine for their circadian clock research.

Rosbash is the 35th MIT alumnus to win a Nobel Prize, and the 88th MIT-connected winner of the prize.

Biologists identify possible new strategy for halting brain tumors

Cutting off a process that cancerous cells rely on can force them to stop growing.

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
September 28, 2017

MIT biologists have discovered a fundamental mechanism that helps brain tumors called glioblastomas grow aggressively. After blocking this mechanism in mice, the researchers were able to halt tumor growth.

The researchers also identified a genetic marker that could be used to predict which patients would most likely benefit from this type of treatment. Glioblastoma is usually treated with radiation and the chemotherapy drug temozolamide, which may extend patients’ lifespans but in most cases do not offer a cure.

“There are very few specific or targeted inhibitors that are used in the treatment of brain cancer. There’s really a dire need for new therapies and new ideas,” says Michael Hemann, an associate professor of biology at MIT, a member of MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and a senior author of the study.

Drugs that block a key protein involved in the newly discovered process already exist, and at least one is in clinical trials to treat cancer. However, most of these inhibitors do not cross the blood-brain barrier, which separates the brain from circulating blood and prevents large molecules from entering the brain. The MIT team hopes to develop drugs that can cross this barrier, possibly by packaging them into nanoparticles.

The study, which appears in Cancer Cell on Sept. 28, is a collaboration between the labs of Hemann; Jacqueline Lees, associate director of the Koch Institute and the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Professor for Cancer Research; and Phillip Sharp, an MIT Institute Professor and member of the Koch Institute. The paper’s lead authors are former MIT postdoc Christian Braun, recent PhD recipient Monica Stanciu, and research scientist Paul Boutz.

Too much splicing

Several years ago, Stanciu and Braun came up with the idea to use a type of screen known as shRNA to seek genes involved in glioblastoma. This test involves using short strands of RNA to block the expression of specific genes. Using this approach, researchers can turn off thousands of different genes, one per tumor cell, and then measure the effects on cell survival.

One of the top hits from this screen was the gene for a protein called PRMT5. When this gene was turned off, tumor cells stopped growing. Previous studies had linked high levels of PRMT5 to cancer, but the protein is an enzyme that can act on hundreds of other proteins, so scientists weren’t sure exactly how it was stimulating cancer cell growth.

Further experiments in which the researchers analyzed other genes affected when PRMT5 was inhibited led them to hypothesize that PRMT5 was using a special type of gene splicing to stimulate tumor growth. Gene splicing is required to snip out portions of messenger RNA known as introns, that are not needed after the gene is copied into mRNA.

In 2015, Boutz and others in Sharp’s lab discovered that about 10 to 15 percent of human mRNA strands still have one to three “detained introns,” even though they are otherwise mature. Because of those introns, these mRNA molecules can’t leave the nucleus.

“What we think is that these strands are basically an mRNA reservoir. You have these unproductive isoforms sitting in the nucleus, and the only thing that keeps them from being translated is that one intron,” says Braun, who is now a physician-scientist at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

In the new study, the researchers discovered that PRMT5 plays a key role in regulating this type of splicing. They speculate that neural stem cells utilize high levels of PRMT5 to guarantee efficient splicing and therefore expression of proliferation genes. “As the cells move toward their mature state, PRMT5 levels drop, detained intron levels rise, and those messenger RNAs associated with proliferation get stuck in the nucleus,” Lees says.

When brain cells become cancerous, PRMT5 levels are typically boosted and the splicing of proliferation-associated mRNA is improved, ultimately helping the cells to grow uncontrollably.

Predicting success

When the researchers blocked PRMT5 in tumor cells, they found that the cells stopped dividing and entered a dormant, nondividing state. PRMT5 inhibitors also halted growth of glioblastoma tumors implanted under the skin of mice, but they did not work as well in tumors located in the brain, because of the difficulties in crossing the blood-brain barrier.

Unlike many existing cancer treatments, the PRMT5 inhibitors did not appear to cause major side effects. The researchers believe this may be because mature cells are not as dependent as cancer cells on PRMT5 function.

The findings shed light on why researchers have previously found PRMT5 to be a promising potential target for cancer treatment, says Omar Abdel-Wahab, an assistant member in the Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, who was not involved in the study.

“PRMT5 has a lot of roles, and until now, it has not been clear what is the pathway that is really important for its contributions to cancer,” says Abdel-Wahab. “What they have found is that one of the key contributions is in this RNA splicing mechanism, and furthermore, when RNA splicing is disrupted, that key pathway is disabled.”

The researchers also discovered a biomarker that could help identify patients who would be most likely to benefit from a PRMT5 inhibitor. This marker is a ratio of two proteins that act as co-factors for PRMT5’s splicing activity, and reveals whether PRMT5 in those tumor cells is involved in splicing or some other cell function.

“This becomes really important when you think about clinical trials, because if 50 percent or 25 percent of tumors are going to have some response and the others are not, you may not have a way to target it toward those patients that may have a particular benefit. The overall success of the trial may be damaged by lack of understanding of who’s going to respond,” Hemann says.

The MIT team is now looking into the potential role of PRMT5 in other types of cancer, including lung tumors. They also hope to identify other genes and proteins involved in the splicing process they discovered, which could also make good drug targets.

Spearheaded by students and postdocs from several different labs, this project offers a prime example of the spirit of collaboration and “scientific entrepreneurship” found at MIT and the Koch Institute, the researchers say.

“I think it really is a classic example of how MIT is a sort of bottom-up place,” Lees says. “Students and postdocs get excited about different ideas, and they sit in on each other’s seminars and hear interesting things and pull them together. It really is an amazing example of the creativity that young people at MIT have. They’re fearless.”

The research was funded by the Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology at MIT, the Koch Institute Frontier Research Program through the Kathy and Curt Marble Cancer Research Fund, the National Institutes of Health, and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Three MIT biologists receive NIH Outstanding Investigator Awards

Graham Walker, Michael Yaffe, and Robert Weinberg earn support from the National Institutes of Health to further their research endeavors.

Raleigh McElvery | Department of Biology
September 19, 2017

This fall, two faculty members from the MIT Department of Biology received R35 Outstanding Investigator Awards sponsored by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), while a third garnered the same distinction from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). These awards provide long-term support to experienced investigators with outstanding records of research productivity as they undertake lengthy projects with unusual potential.

Graham Walker, the American Cancer Society Professor in the Department of Biology at MIT, a member of the Center for Environmental Health Sciences, and affiliate member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, is one of two biology faculty to earn the R35 Outstanding Investigator Award from the NIEHS.

This award is supported by the NIEHS through the Revolutionizing Innovative, Visionary Environmental health Research (RIVER) program. The program recognizes outstanding investigators in the field of environmental health, potentially offering up to $750,000 per year over the next eight years.

The awardees include both mid-career and senior researchers, whose work spans many aspects environmental health science — including technology development, mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiological research. A total of eight investigators received the NIEHS RIVER R35 this year.

“The RIVER program is designed to fund people, not projects,” said David Balshaw, chief of the NIEHS Exposure, Response, and Technology Branch who leads the NIEHS team overseeing this initiative. “It gives outstanding environmental health scientists stable funding, time, and, importantly, flexibility to pursue creative scientific ideas, rather than constantly writing grants to support their research programs.”

Walker will use his award to continue investigating the fundamental mechanisms of mutagenesis and DNA repair, with a special emphasis on the Rev1/3/7-dependent pathway of mutagenic translation synthesis found in eukaryotes, including humans. He and his colleagues recently published evidence suggesting that inhibiting this pathway could potentially improve chemotherapy.

Michael Yaffe, the David H. Koch Professor of Science at MIT, a member of the Koch Institute and the Center for Environmental Health Sciences, and attending surgeon at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, also received a NIEHS RIVER R35 award.

Yaffe’s work concerns how cells respond to injury, including damage to DNA and RNA molecules arising because of the environment and in response to drugs used to treat cancer. He is also interested in the relationship between inflammation, blood clotting, and cancer. He employs multidisciplinary approaches harnessing techniques from biochemistry, structural and cell biology, computer science, and systems biology/engineering.

Yaffe will use his funds to further a project investigating the roles of protein kinases in coordinating cellular responses to damage to both DNA and RNA molecules.

Robert Weinberg, founding member of the Whitehead Institute, professor of biology at MIT, an affiliate member of the Koch Institute, and director of the MIT Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology, has received his R35 Outstanding Investigator Award from the NCI.

The award provides up to $600,000 per year over seven years to accomplished cancer researchers, nominated by their institutions, who have served as principal investigators on an NCI grant for the last five years. A total of 18 investigators received the NCI Outstanding Investigator Award this year.

“The NCI Outstanding Investigator Award addresses a problem that many cancer researchers experience: finding a balance between focusing on their science while ensuring that they will have funds to continue their research in the future,” said Dinah Singer, director of NCI’s Division of Cancer Biology. “With seven years of uninterrupted funding, NCI is providing investigators the opportunity to fully develop exceptional and ambitious cancer research programs.”

Weinberg is a pioneer in cancer research, best known for his role in discovering the first human oncogene — a gene that, when activated, can spur tumor growth. His lab is also credited with isolating the first known tumor suppressor gene.

He will use his funds to delve into the mechanisms of metastasis — the process that allows cancer cells to spread. He aims to learn more about how these cells disseminate from primary tumors, as well as how they become established in distant tissues after they metastasize.