Research Area: Genetics

Heart-healthy plant chemistry
Greta Friar | Whitehead Institute
October 29, 2018

Plants have been a rich source of medicines for thousands of years. Compounds such as artemisinin, for example, used to treat malaria, and morphine, a pain reliever, are mainstay therapeutics derived from plants. However, several roadblocks in plant chemistry research have prevented scientists from tapping into the full potential of plant-based medicinal compounds, thwarting drug discovery and development. Researchers typically screen for molecules of interest by breaking the plant into very small pieces, using biochemistry to test the activity of the pieces, and isolating the molecules responsible for the activity. It is often difficult, however, to pick the right compound responsible for a medicinal effect out of the plant mixture, or to identify the genes responsible for producing it.

The Chinese wolfberry plant (Lycium barbarum), also known as goji berry, has been used in traditional Chinese herbal medicine for millennia to treat symptoms such as high blood pressure. Researchers had identified small protein-like molecules called lyciumins, produced by the goji berry, as the source of its antihypertensive properties but little else was known about the molecules.

In research published online October 29 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Whitehead Institute Member Jing-Ke Weng and postdoctoral researcher Roland Kersten describe an approach to speed up the process of identifying plant chemistry that they used to investigate lyciumins. The approach capitalizes on the growing number of plants that have had their genomes sequenced. The wealth of genomic data available enabled Kersten to identify the gene that is associated with lyciumin production in goji berries by searching for a DNA sequence that matched the sequences of the lyciumins. Once Kersten found the matching precursor gene in goji berries he inserted it into a tobacco plant, which began producing lyciumins, confirming that he had found the right gene.

Kersten then hunted for lyciumin-producing genes in other plant genomes using a common feature of the genes that he had identified as a search query. He discovered more than one hundred unknown lyciumins in everything from potatoes to beets to soybeans.

Having sped up the gene discovery stage, Kersten used gene expression techniques to likewise speed up the molecule production stage. Being able to quickly produce large quantities of a drug candidate is necessary for testing and manufacturing the drug. Kersten edited the lyciumin precursor genes to make more copies of the molecule and then inserted the edited genes into the tobacco plant to mass produce lyciumins up to 40 times faster than the original plants. Kersten was also able to edit the lyciumins’ DNA sequences to alter the molecules’ structure, creating new varieties of lyciumins not found in nature. Together, these results allow for the future creation of a lyciumin library, a valuable repository for drug discovery research. Millions of different lyciumins can be grown in tobacco and tested for their efficacy as antihypertensive drugs or in other potential agrochemical and pharmaceutical applications.

Weng and Kersten’s approach leverages the recent explosion in plant genomics to uncover important medicinal compounds in plants and reveal the secrets of plants used in traditional global medicine for generations. For Kersten, the research was also an exciting demonstration of just how much undiscovered chemistry lies waiting to be tapped in even the best-studied crop plants.

This work was supported by grants from the Thome Foundation, the Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences, the Searle Scholars Program, and the Family Larsson Rosenquist Foundation.

***
Jing-Ke Weng’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also an assistant professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
***
Full citation:
“Gene-guided discovery and engineering of branched cyclic peptides in plants”
PNAS, online on October 29.
Roland D. Kersten (1), Jing-Ke Weng (1,2)
1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, United States
2. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
How Many Evolutionary Events Can It Take To Screw in Nature’s Lightbulb?

Firefly genomics reveals independent evolution of bioluminescence in beetles

Lisa Girard | Whitehead Institute
October 16, 2018

Cambridge, MA — Researchers at Whitehead Institute and collaborators from fourteen other institutions around the world have shed light on the evolutionary origins of luciferase, the key enzyme behind the glow of fireflies and other bioluminescent beetles. By sequencing the genomes of two American and Japanese firefly species that diverged approximately 100 million years ago, along with a more evolutionarily distant bioluminescent Caribbean click beetle, the team discovered that luciferase appears to have arisen independently in fireflies and click beetles. Examining the genes flanking that encoding the luciferase gene, suggests an evolutionary path along which the luciferase gene arose from duplications and divergences of CoA ligase genes involved in fat metabolism. As described online October 16 in the journal eLife, these findings provide fundamental insights into how enzymes can evolve, potentially inform strategies to help protect bioluminescent beetles from a shifting climate and habitat, and could extend the utility of luciferase, which has also been harnessed for biomedical and agricultural research, as a laboratory tool.

Throughout much of the world, the silent flash of a firefly on a warm evening can only mean one thing-Summer has arrived. But fireflies don’t just signal summer, their glow serves as a mating signal to other fireflies, and is even a warning that they are chemically defended, having a noxious taste capable of repelling the boldest of predators.

Belying its grandeur, the chemistry of firefly bioluminescence is relatively straightforward. Their light is produced by a specialized firefly enzyme, luciferase, that breaks down a molecule called luciferin, producing light in the process. Luciferase has become a mainstay tool in the laboratory. Scientists can fuse their gene of interest to luciferase and assay for gene expression by measuring the intensity of the glow after luciferin is added.

Beyond fireflies, there are other bioluminescent beetles (despite their name, fireflies are actually beetles), including certain tropical click-beetles. Perplexingly, these diverse bioluminescent beetles use very similar luciferase enzymes and luciferin molecules, but have an unrelated anatomy of their light-producing organs (also known as lanterns), making it unclear if their bioluminescence evolved from a common luminous ancestor, or if their special glow evolved independently.

Since fireflies and bioluminescent click-beetles are not model organisms like mice or fruit flies for which there is a wealth of genetic information, Jing-Ke Weng, Whitehead Institute Member and assistant professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), along with a  graduate student in Weng’s lab, Tim Fallon, and Cornell postdoctoral researcher, Sarah Lower, began their investigations by sequencing the genome of the American Big Dipper firefly, Photinus pyralis. Named for its distinctive swooping “J” flash , this common inhabitant of meadows and suburban lawns has been called the “All-American firefly”. Due to its abundance and ease of identification, it was also the firefly of choice for scientific study, and is the species from which luciferin and luciferase were first characterized. Wanting to start their work quickly and make their progress and data available to others in the firefly community, Whitehead Institute researchers and collaborators crowdsourced funds to sequence the Big Dipper firefly.

The Big Dipper genome sequence, they discovered, revealed interesting insights into the origin of the luciferase gene. Examining the genes flanking that encoding luciferase, they found a cluster, or tandem repeat, of fatty acid CoA ligase genes with the luciferase gene sitting in the middle of this cluster. Sequence similarity and proximity between the luciferase and fatty acid CoA ligase genes suggested an evolutionary path along which the luciferase gene was produced from tandem duplication and divergence of an ancestral fatty acid CoA ligase gene.

“When the luciferase gene was cloned, people knew it was similar to the fatty acid CoA ligase gene in sequence, and hypothesized that it must be related to that ancestry. But what we uncovered from the luciferase gene locus is a tandem repeat of five genes, four are still the fatty acid CoA ligases, but then luciferase evolved right in the middle we believe from divergence of one of these duplications,” says Weng.

The Big Dipper sequencing provided important insights into the origin of luciferase and additional factors involved in bioluminescence, but in order to gain additional insights into the evolution of bioluminescence, the researchers set out to sequence two additional species that they hoped would provide the additional context to help them triangulate on some answers.

The bioluminescent click beetle, Ignelater luminosus, is related to the firefly, but on another branch of the tree of life entirely. Instead of producing light at its tail, it has two lanterns behind its head.

“We thought that sequencing the click beetle would provide insights into the evolution of bioluminescence as well as perhaps into how these animals could acquire very similar traits in terms of their biochemistry, but not in terms of their development,” says Fallon.

The third species they selected to sequence was a Japanese aquatic firefly (Aquatica lateralis), known in Japan as the Heike firefly.  Heike and the Big Dipper diverged from one another over 100 million years ago (to give you a sense of how far this is, it is older than the evolutionary distance between humans and rodents).

The researchers analyzed genomic data from the Japanese aquatic firefly and saw a similar arrangement around the luciferase gene locus as they had in the Big Dipper genome, suggesting that luciferase arose from a common ancestral event in both firefly species. The structure around the luciferase locus in the click beetle, however, was entirely absent, suggesting that luciferase arose through a different event.  Taken together, by sequencing and analyzing data from the genomes of two firefly species that diverged approximately 100 million years ago, along with a more evolutionarily distant bioluminescent click beetle, the team discovered that luciferase appears to have evolved independently in both fireflies and click beetles.

“Having the genome allowed us to understand how the evolution of luciferase happened. Before sequencing, we knew there were five genes cloned, including luciferase, in firefly. By sequencing the genomes we actually uncovered those genomic loci where those initial gene duplication events occured,” says Lower.

In addition to the origins of luciferase, these findings also provided the researchers with insights into the evolution of the light organs.

“Since our findings suggest that luciferase originated independently in both lineages, we can infer that anything that came after luciferase, for example the light organs, or other things dependent on luciferase should also be independent,” says Fallon.

Discovering how bioluminescence arose, as well as other complex traits, can be studied now that genomic information is available. The information can also inform strategies to protect fireflies, whose populations in many parts of the world are diminishing. In addition to adding tools to help reveal a constituent parts list that could allow researchers to optimize bioluminescence as a tool, these findings reveal important insights into the evolution of bioluminescence as well as genomic evolution more broadly.

“Luciferase is a perfect example of how to build a new enzyme, duplication of a related progenitor gene followed by mutation and selection,” says Weng. “And one of the most exciting parts of this study was that by examining the evolutionary scars in the genomes we studied we could actually see it happen.”

* * *
Jing-Ke Weng’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also an assistant professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* * *
Full citation:
“Firefly genomes illuminate parallel origins of bioluminescence in beetles”
eLife, online on October 9, 2018. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36495
Timothy R. Fallon (1,2,*), Sarah E. Lower (3,*), Ching-Ho Chang (4) , Manabu Bessho-Uehara (5,6), Gavin J. Martin (7), Adam J. Bewick (8) , Megan Behringer (9) , Humberto J. Debat (10), Isaac Wong (4) , John C. Day (11), Anton Suvorov (7) , Christian J. Silva (4,12), Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall1 (3), David W. Hall (8) , Robert J. Schmitz (8), David R. Nelson (14), Sara M. Lewis (15), Shuji Shigenobu (16), Seth M. Bybee (7) , Amanda M. Larracuente (4), Yuichi Oba (5), and Jing-Ke Weng (1,2)
1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
2.Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
3. Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA.
4. Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.
5. Department of Environmental Biology, Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi 487-8501, Japan.
6. Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan.
7. Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
8. Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
9. Biodesign Center for Mechanisms of Evolution, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.
10. Center of Agronomic Research National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Córdoba, Argentina.
11. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) Wallingford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
12. Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
13. Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
14. Department of Microbiology Immunology and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee  HSC, Memphis 38163, USA.
15. Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
16. NIBB Core Research Facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Detangling DNA replication

Researchers identify an essential protein that helps enzymes relax overtwisted DNA so each strand can be copied during cell division.

Raleigh McElvery | Department of Biology
September 18, 2018

DNA is a lengthy molecule — approximately 1,000-fold longer than the cell in which it resides — so it can’t be jammed in haphazardly. Rather, it must be neatly organized so proteins involved in critical processes can access the information contained in its nucleotide bases. Think of the double helix like a pair of shoe laces twisted together, coiled upon themselves again and again to make the molecule even more compact.

However, when it comes time for cell division, this supercoiled nature makes it difficult for proteins involved in DNA replication to access the strands, separate them, and copy them so one DNA molecule can become two.

Replication begins at specific regions of the chromosome where specialized proteins separate the two strands, pulling apart the double helix as you would the two shoe laces. However, this local separation actually tangles the rest of the molecule further, and without intervention creates a buildup of tension, stalling replication. Enter the enzymes known as topoisomerases, which travel ahead of the strands as they are being peeled apart, snipping them, untwisting them, and then rejoining them to relieve the tension that arises from supercoiling.

These topoisomerases are generally thought to be sufficient to allow replication to proceed. However, a team of researchers from MIT and the Duke University School of Medicine suggests the enzymes may require guidance from additional proteins, which recognize the shape characteristic of overtwisted DNA.

“We’ve known for a long time that topoisomerases are necessary for replication, but it’s never been clear if they were sufficient on their own,” says Michael Laub, an MIT professor of biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, and senior author of the study. “This is the first paper to identify a protein in bacteria, or eukaryotes, that is required to localize topoisomerases ahead of replication forks and to help them do what they need to do there.”

Postdoc Monica Guo ’07 and former graduate student Diane Haakonsen PhD ’16 are co-first authors of the study, which appeared online in the journal Cell on Sept. 13.

Necessary but not sufficient

Although it’s well established that topoisomerases are crucial to DNA replication, it has now becoming clear that we know relatively little about the mechanisms regulating their activity, including where and when they act to relieve supercoiling.

These enzymes fall into two groups, type I and type II, depending on how many strands of DNA they cut. The researchers focused on type II topoisomerases found in a common species of freshwater bacteria, Caulobacter crescentus. Type II topoisomerases in bacteria are of particular interest because a number of antibiotics target them in order to prevent DNA replication, treating a wide variety of microbial infections, including tuberculosis. Without topoisomerases, the bacteria can’t grow. Since these bacterial enzymes are unique, poisons directed at them won’t harm human topoisomerases.

For a long time, type II topoisomerases were generally assumed adequate on their own to manage the overtwisted supercoils that arise during replication. Although researchers working in E. coli and other, higher organisms have pinpointed additional proteins that can activate or repress these enzymes, none of these proteins were required for replication.

Such findings hinted that there might be similar interactions taking place in other organisms. In order to understand the protein factors involved in compacting Caulobacter DNA — regulating topoisomerase activity specifically — the researchers screened their bacteria for proteins that bound tightly to supercoiled DNA. From there, they honed in on one protein, GapR, which they observed was essential for DNA replication. In bacteria missing GapR, the DNA became overtwisted, replication slowed, and the bacteria eventually died.

Surprisingly, the researchers found that GapR recognized the structure of overtwisted DNA rather than specific nucleotide sequences.

“The vast majority of DNA-binding proteins localize to specific locations of the genome by recognizing a specific set of bases,” Laub says. “But GapR basically pays no attention to the actual underlying sequence — just the shape of overtwisted DNA, which uniquely arises in front of replication forks and transcription machinery.”

The crystal structure of the protein bound to DNA, solved by Duke’s Maria Schumacher, revealed that GapR recognizes the backbone of DNA (rather than the bases), forming a snug clamp that encircles the overtwisted DNA. However, when the DNA is relaxed in its standard form, it no longer fits inside the clamp. This might signify that GapR sits on DNA only at positions where topoisomerase is needed.

An exciting milestone

Although GapR appears to be required for DNA replication, it’s still not clear precisely how this protein promotes topoisomerase function to relieve supercoiling.

“In the absence of any other proteins, GapR is able to help type II topoisomerases remove positive supercoils faster, but we still don’t quite know how,” Guo says. “One idea is that GapR interacts with topoisomerases, recognizing the overtwisted DNA and recruiting the topoisomerases. Another possibility is that GapR is essentially grabbing onto the DNA and limiting the movement of the positive supercoils, so topoisomerases can target and eliminate them more quickly.”

Anthony Maxwell, a professor of biological chemistry at the John Innes Centre who was not involved with the study, says the buildup of DNA supercoils is a key problem in both bacterial replication and transcription.

“Identifying GapR and its potential role in controlling supercoiling in vivo is an exciting milestone in understanding the control of DNA topology in bacteria,” he says. “Further work will be required to show how exactly these proteins cooperate to maintain bacterial genomic integrity.”

According to Guo, the study provides insight into a fundamental process — DNA replication — and the ways topoisomerases are regulated, which could extend to eukaryotes.

“This was the first demonstration that a topoisomerase activator is required for DNA replication,” she says. “Although there’s no GapR homolog in higher organisms, there could be similar proteins that recognize the shape of the DNA and aid or position topoisomerases.”

This could open up a new field of drug research, she says, targeting activators like GapR to increase the efficacy of existing topoisomerase poisons to treat conditions like respiratory and urinary tract infections. After all, many topoisomerase inhibitors have become less effective due to antibiotic resistance. But only time will tell; there is still much to learn in order to untangle the complex process of DNA replication, along with its many twists and turns.

The research was funded by NIH grants, the HHMI International Predoctoral Fellowship, and the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fellowship.

Jarrett Smith receives Hanna Gray Fellowship from HHMI
Greta Friar | Whitehead Institute
September 12, 2018

Cambridge, Mass — Jarrett Smith, postdoctoral researcher in David Bartel’s lab at the Whitehead Institute, has been announced as a recipient of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)’s 2018 Hanna Gray fellowship. The fellowship supports outstanding early career scientists from groups underrepresented in the life sciences. Each of this year’s fifteen awardees will be given up to $1.4 million dollars in funding over the course of their postdoctoral program and beginning of a tenure-track faculty position.

“This program will help us retain the most diverse talent in science,” said HHMI President Erin O’Shea. “We feel it’s critically important in academia to have exceptional people from all walks of life, all cultures, and all backgrounds – people who can inspire the next generation of scientists.”

For Smith, who began his postdoctoral training in the Bartel lab in January, finding out he got the fellowship was a defining moment.

“I’m grateful for the support that the fellowship will provide during the formative years of my career,” Smith says. “This kind of opportunity gives you the confidence to set ambitious research goals and find out what you can accomplish.”

In the Bartel lab, Smith studies how cells respond to stress. When a cell is exposed to environmental stressors such as heat, UV radiation, or viral infection, proteins and RNAs in the cell may clump together into dense aggregates called stress granules. Several diseases are associated with altered stress granule formation, but the exact function of stress granules and their potential role in disease are unknown. Smith is investigating changes in the cell linked to their formation. His findings could shed light on a potential role for stress granules in cancer, viral infection, and neurodegenerative disease.

Growing up, Smith was always interested in science but no one in his family had ever received a PhD, making biology research feel like an unlikely career path for him. Nevertheless, he followed his passion, which led him to a PhD program at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Despite his strong academic performance, Smith began graduate school with doubts about his ability to become a scientist. His mentors were incredible teachers but their self-assuredness could be intimidating.

“They were absolutely my role models, but I didn’t think of them as having gone through what I was going through. In the first few years, I felt like I had a lot of catching up to do,” Smith said.

Smith says he was frequently inspired and guided by his graduate school mentor, Geraldine Seydoux. Under her tutorship he became more confident in his abilities.

“I try to pick mentors who are the kind of scientist I aspire to be,” Smith said.

With that tenet in mind, he set his sights on David Bartel’s lab for his postdoctoral research. He had heard that Bartel was a great mentor and knew the Bartel lab had expertise in all of the research techniques he wanted to learn. Since arriving at Whitehead Institute, Smith says he has experienced support not only from Bartel, but from the entire lab as well.

“Jarrett’s graduate experience with P granules in nematodes brings much appreciated expertise to our lab, and we are all excited about what he will discover here on stress-granule function,” Bartel says. “Receiving this fellowship is a well-deserved honor, and I am very happy for him.”

Smith noted that he is deeply grateful for the community he’s found at Whitehead Institute. However, he also noted that throughout his scientific career he has typically been the only black person in the room. One of the joys of applying for the fellowship was meeting the rest of the candidates, a diverse and impressive group of scientists, he says. He looks forward to seeing the other fellows again at meetings hosted by the HHMI.

“I’ve never really had a scientific role model that shared those experiences or that I could identify with in that way,” Smith says, but he hopes that future aspiring scientists won’t have to go through the same experience. His brother-in-law recently began an undergraduate major in biology. Smith enjoys being there to answer his questions about school work or life as a researcher.

“I’d never ask him if he thinks of me as a role model,” Smith says, laughing. “But I’m glad that I have the chance to help people who—like I did—might question whether they could be successful in the sciences.” With the support of the fellowship and his lab, and an exciting research question he is eager to tackle, Smith has never been more certain that he belongs right where he is.

Tissue architecture affects chromosome segregation

Biologists discover that the environment surrounding a cell plays an integral role in its ability to accurately segregate its chromosomes.

Ashley Junger | Koch Institute
August 24, 2018

All growth and reproduction relies on a cell’s ability to replicate its chromosomes and produce accurate copies of itself. Every step of this process takes place within that cell.

Based on this observation, scientists have studied the replication and segregation of chromosomes as a phenomenon exclusively internal to the cell. They traditionally rely on warm nutritional cultures that promote growth but bear little resemblance to the cell’s external surroundings while in its natural environment.

New research by a group of MIT biologists reveals that this long-held assumption is incorrect. In a paper published this week, they describe how some types of cells rely on signals from surrounding tissue in order to maintain chromosome stability and segregate accurately.

Kristin Knouse, a fellow at the Whitehead Institute, is the lead author of the paper, which was published online in the journal Cell on Aug. 23. Angelika Amon, the Kathleen and Curtis Marble Professor in Cancer Research in the Department of Biology and a member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, is the senior author.

“The main takeaway from this paper is that we must study cells in their native tissues to really understand their biology,” Amon says. “Results obtained from cell lines that have evolved to divide on plastic dishes do not paint the whole picture.”

When cells replicate, the newly duplicated chromosomes line up within the cell and cellular structures pull one copy to each side. The cell then divides down the middle, separating one copy of each chromosome into each new daughter cell.

At least, that’s how it’s supposed to work. In reality, there are sometimes errors in the process of separating chromosomes into daughter cells, known as chromosome mis-segregation. Some errors simply result in damage to the DNA. Other errors can result in the chromosomes being unevenly divided between daughter cells, a condition called aneuploidy.

These errors are almost always harmful to cell development and can be fatal. In developing embryos, aneuploidy can cause miscarriages or developmental disorders such as Down syndrome. In adults, chromosome instability is seen in a large number of cancers.

To study these errors, scientists have historically removed cells from their surrounding tissue and placed them into easily controlled plastic cultures.

“Chromosome segregation has been studied in a dish for decades,” Knouse says. “I think the assumption was … a cell would segregate chromosomes the same way in a dish as it would in a tissue because everything was happening inside the cell.”

However, in previous work, Knouse had found that reported rates for aneuploidy in cells grown in cultures was much higher than the rates she found in cells that had grown within their native tissue. This prompted her and her colleagues to investigate whether the surroundings of a cell influence the accuracy with which that cell divided.

To answer this question, they compared mis-segregation rates between five different cell types in native and non-native environments.

But not all cells’ native environments are the same. Some cells, like those that form skin, grow in a very structured context, where they always have neighbors and defined directions for growth. Other cells, however, like cells in the blood, have greater independence, with little interaction with the surrounding tissue.

In the new study, the researchers observed that cells that grew in structured environments in their native tissues divided accurately within those tissues. But once they were placed into a dish, the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation drastically increased. The cells that were less tied to structures in their tissue were not affected by the lack of architecture in culture dishes.

The researchers found that maintaining the architectural conditions of the cell’s native environment is essential for chromosome stability. Cells removed from the context of their tissue don’t always faithfully represent natural processes.

The researchers determined that architecture didn’t have an obvious effect on the expression of known genes involved in segregation. The disruption in tissue architecture likely causes mechanical changes that disrupt segregation, in a manner that is independent of mutations or gene expression changes.

“It was surprising to us that for something so intrinsic to the cell — something that’s happening entirely within the cell and so fundamental to the cell’s existence — where that cell is sitting actually matters quite a bit,” Knouse says.

Through the Cancer Genome Project, scientists learned that despite high rates of chromosome mis-segregation, many cancers lack any mutations to the cellular machinery that controls chromosome partitioning. This left scientists searching for the cause of the increase of these division errors. This study suggests that tissue architecture could be the culprit.

Cancer development often involves disruption of tissue architecture, whether during tumor growth or metastasis. This disruption of the extracellular environment could trigger chromosome segregation errors in the cells within the tumor.

“I think [this paper] really could be the explanation for why certain kinds of cancers become chromosomally unstable,” says Iain Cheeseman, a professor of biology at MIT and a member of the Whitehead Institute, who was not involved in the study.

The results point not only to a new understanding of the cellular mechanical triggers and effects of cancers, but also to a new understanding of how cell biology must be studied.

“Clearly a two-dimensional culture system does not faithfully recapitulate even the most fundamental processes, like chromosome segregation,” Knouse says. “As cell biologists we really must start recognizing that context matters.”

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Kathy and Curt Marble Cancer Research Fund, and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Researchers discover new type of lung cell, critical insights for cystic fibrosis

A comprehensive single-cell analysis of airway cells in mice, validated in human tissue, reveals molecular details critical to understanding lung disease.

Karen Zusi
August 1, 2018

Researchers have identified a rare cell type in airway tissue, previously uncharacterized in the scientific literature, that appears to play a key role in the biology of cystic fibrosis. Using new technologies that enable scientists to study gene expression in thousands of individual cells, the team comprehensively analyzed the airway in mice and validated the results in human tissue.

Led by researchers from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), the molecular survey also characterized gene expression patterns for other new cell subtypes. The work expands scientific and clinical understanding of lung biology, with broad implications for all diseases of the airway — including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bronchitis.

Jayaraj Rajagopal, a physician in the Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit at MGH, associate member at the Broad Institute, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) faculty scholar, and Broad core institute member Aviv Regev, director of the Klarman Cell Observatory at the Broad Institute, professor of biology at MIT, and an HHMI investigator, supervised the research. Daniel Montoro, a graduate student in Rajagopal’s lab, and postdoctoral fellows Adam Haber and Moshe Biton in the Regev lab are co-first authors on the paper published today in Nature.

“We have the framework now for a new cellular narrative of lung disease,” said Rajagopal, who is also a professor at Harvard Medical School and a principal faculty member at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute. “We’ve uncovered a whole distribution of cell types that seem to be functionally relevant. What’s more, genes associated with complex lung diseases can now be linked to specific cells that we’ve characterized. The data are starting to change the way we think about lung diseases like cystic fibrosis and asthma.”

“With single-cell sequencing technology, and dedicated efforts to map cell types in different tissues, we’re making new discoveries — new cells that we didn’t know existed, cell subtypes that are rare or haven’t been noticed before, even in systems that have been studied for decades,” said Regev, who is also co-chair of the international Human Cell Atlas consortium. “And for some of these, understanding and characterizing them sheds new light immediately on what’s happening inside the tissue.”

Using single-cell RNA sequencing, the researchers analyzed tens of thousands of cells from the mouse airway, mapping the physical locations of cell types and creating a cellular “atlas” of the tissue. They also developed a new method called pulse-seq to monitor development of cell types from their progenitors in the mouse airway. The findings were validated in human tissue.

One extremely rare cell type, making up roughly one percent of the cell population in mice and humans, appeared radically different from other known cells in the dataset. The team dubbed this cell the “pulmonary ionocyte” because its gene expression pattern was similar to ionocytes — specialized cells that regulate ion transport and hydration in fish gills and frog skin.

Strikingly, at levels higher than any other cell type, these ionocytes expressed the gene CFTR — which, when mutated, causes cystic fibrosis in humans. CFTR is critical for airway function, and for decades researchers and clinicians have assumed that it is frequently expressed at low levels in ciliated cells, a common cell type spread throughout the entire airway.

But according to the new data, the majority of CFTR expression occurs in only a few cells, which researchers didn’t even know existed until now.

When the researchers disrupted a critical molecular process in pulmonary ionocytes in mice, they observed the onset of key features associated with cystic fibrosis — most notably, the formation of dense mucus. This finding underscores how important these cells are to airway-surface regulation.

“Cystic fibrosis is an amazingly well-studied disease, and we’re still discovering completely new biology that may alter the way we approach it,” said Rajagopal. “At first, we couldn’t believe that the majority of CFTR expression was located in these rare cells, but the graduate students and postdocs on this project really brought us along with their data.”

The results may also have implications for developing targeted cystic fibrosis therapies, according to the team. For example, a gene therapy that corrects for a mutation in CFTRwould need to be delivered to the right cells, and a cell atlas of the tissue could provide a reference map to guide that process.

The study further highlighted where other disease-associated genes are expressed in the airway. For example, asthma development has been previously linked with a gene that encodes a sensor for rhinoviruses, and the data now indicate that this gene is expressed by ciliated cells. Another gene linked with asthma is expressed in tuft cells, which separated into at least two groups — one that senses chemicals in the airway and one that produces inflammation. The results suggest that a whole ensemble of cells may be responsible for different aspects of asthma.

Using the pulse-seq assay, the researchers tracked how the newly characterized cells and subtypes in the mouse airway develop. They demonstrated that mature cells in the airway arise from a common progenitor: the basal cells. The team also discovered a previously undescribed cellular structure in the tissue. These structures, which the researchers called “hillocks,” are unique zones of rapid cell turnover, and their function is not yet understood.

“The atlas that we’ve created is already starting to drastically re-shape our understanding of airway and lung biology,” said Regev. “And, for this and other organ systems being studied at the single-cell level, we’ll have to drape everything we know on top of this new cellular diversity to understand human health and disease.”

Funding for this study was provided in part by the Klarman Cell Observatory at the Broad Institute, Manton Foundation, HHMI, New York Stem Cell Foundation, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Human Frontiers Science Program, and National Institutes of Health.

Paper(s) cited:

Montoro DT, Haber AL, Biton M et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature. Online August 1, 2018. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0393-7

The Y chromosome: Holding steadfast in a sea of change
Nicole Davis
August 2, 2018

The human Y chromosome is, in many ways, a study in contrasts. For decades, scientists have struggled to dissect its evolution in part because it does not have a genetic partner (or homolog), as all of the other human chromosomes do. That solitary existence means the Y chromosome is subject to some unusual evolutionary pressures. For example, it does not swap genetic material with a homologous chromosome — a practice known as recombination that other chromosomes follow — along the lion’s share of its length. However, its lack of recombination presents a unique opportunity: Because so much of its own genetic material stays put, scientists can trace the history of individual human Y chromosomes much further back in time than other chromosomes — in fact, they can go as far back as the data will allow.

That is precisely the approach taken by a team of Whitehead Institute researchers, led by Whitehead Institute Director David Page, who is also a professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. Their work is published in the August 2nd online issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics. Page and his colleagues, including graduate student and first author Levi Teitz, set out to examine a series of regions on the Y chromosome called amplicons — vast stretches of DNA, from tens of thousands to millions of nucleotides in length, which are present in two or more copies per chromosome. While the DNA contained in amplicons is often highly repetitive, it also houses biologically important genes. Although the precise functions of many of these genes remains to be determined, some have been found to play important roles in the development of sperm cells and testicular cancer. However, the amplicons vary drastically among species, so scientists cannot look to other organisms such as mice or chimpanzees to help reconstruct their past.

Page’s team zeroed in on these amplicons. Specifically, they looked at how the number of amplicon copies varies from one person’s Y chromosome to another. The researchers developed sophisticated computational tools to analyze DNA sequencing data collected from more than 1,200 males as part of the 1000 Genomes Project. What they discovered was quite surprising. Although the amplicons are quite variable, they found that overall, the configuration of amplicon copies on the Y chromosome has been painstakingly maintained over the last 300,000 years of human evolution. That means that despite the high level of mutation the chromosome experiences, evolutionary forces work to counteract this change and preserve its ancestral structure.

More work is needed to determine which aspects of the amplicons’ structure are important for chromosome biology, and in turn proper male development and fertility. However, the efforts of Teitz, Page, and their colleagues shed new light on the unusual tricks the solo chromosome uses to maintain its genomic integrity.

This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

 

Written by Nicole Davis

****

David Page’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and a Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

 ****

Full citation:

“Selection Has Countered High Mutability to Preserve the Ancestral Copy Number of Y Chromosome Amplicons in Diverse Human Lineages”

American Journal of Human Genetics, online August 2, 2018.

Levi S. Teitz (1,2), Tatyana Pyntikova (1), Helen Skaletsky (1,3), and David C. Page (1,2,3).

1. Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

2. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

Restricting a key cellular nutrient could slow tumor growth

Researchers identify the amino acid aspartate as a metabolic limitation in certain cancers.

Raleigh McElvery | Department of Biology
June 29, 2018

Remove tumor cells from a living organism and place them in a dish, and they will multiply even faster than before. The mystery of why this is has long stumped cancer researchers, though many have simply focused on the mutations and chains of molecular reactions that could prompt such a disparity. Now, a group of MIT researchers suggests that the growth limitations in live organisms may stem from a different source: the cell’s environment. More specifically, they found that the amino acid aspartate serves as a key nutrient needed for the “proliferation” or rapid duplication of cancer cells when oxygen is not freely available.

The biologists took cancer cells from various tissue types and engineered them to convert another, more abundant substrate into aspartate using the gene encoding an enzyme from guinea pigs. This had no effect on the cells sitting in a dish, but the same cells implanted into mice engendered tumors that grew faster than ever before. The researchers had increased the cells’ aspartate supply, and in doing so successfully sped up proliferation in a living entity.

“There hasn’t been a lot of thought into what slows tumor growth in terms of the cellular environment, including the sort of food cancer cells need,” says Matthew Vander Heiden, associate professor of biology, associate director of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and senior author of the study. “For instance, if you’re trying to get to a given destination and I want to slow you down, my best bet is to set up a roadblock at a place on your route where you’d experience a slow-down anyways, like a long traffic light. That’s essentially what we’re interested in here — understanding what nutrients the cell is already lacking that put the brakes on proliferation, and then further limiting those nutrients to inhibit growth even more.”

Lucas Sullivan, a postdoc in Vander Heiden’s lab, is the lead author of the study, which appeared in Nature Cell Biology on June 25.

Building the case for aspartate

Isolating a single factor that could impact tumor growth within an organism is tricky business. One potential candidate came to Sullivan via a paper he co-authored with graduate student Dan Gui in 2015, which asked a somewhat controversial question: Why is it that cells need to consume oxygen through cellular respiration in order to proliferate?

It’s a rather counter-intuitive question, because some scientific literature suggests just the opposite: Cancer cells in an organism (“in vivo”) do not enjoy the same access to oxygen as they would in a dish, and therefore don’t depend on oxygen to produce enough energy to divide. Instead, they switch to a different process, fermentation, that doesn’t require oxygen. But Sullivan and Gui noted that cancer cells do rely on oxygen for another reason: to produce aspartate as a byproduct.

Aspartate, they soon confirmed, does, in fact, play a crucial role in controlling the rate of cancer cell proliferation. In another study one year later, Sullivan and Gui noted that the antidiabetic drug metformin, known to inhibit mitochondria, slowed tumor growth and decreased aspartate levels in cells in vivo. Since mitochondria are key to cellular respiration, Sullivan reasoned that blocking their function in an already oxygen-constrained environment (the tumor) might make cancer cells vulnerable to further suppression of respiration — and aspartate — explaining why metformin seems to have such a strong effect on tumor growth.

Despite being potentially required for certain amino acids and the synthesis of all four DNA nucleotides, aspartate is already hard to come by, even in oxygen-rich environments. It’s among the lowest concentration amino acids in our blood, and has no way to enter our cells unless a rare protein transporter is present. Precisely why aspartate import is so inefficient remains an evolutionary mystery; one possibility is that its scarcity serves as a “failsafe,” preventing cells from multiplying until they have all the resources to properly do so.

Regardless, the easiest way for cells to get aspartate is not to import it from outside, but rather to make it directly inside, breaking down another amino acid called asparagine to generate it. However, there are very few known mammals that have an enzyme capable of producing aspartate from asparagine — among them, the guinea pig.

Channeling the guinea pig

In the 1950s, a researcher named John Kidd made an accidental discovery. He injected cancer-ridden rats with sera from various animals — rabbits, horses, guinea pigs, and the like — and discovered that guinea pig serum alone shrunk the rats’ tumors. It wasn’t until years later that scientists learned it was an enzyme in the guinea pig blood called guinea pig asparaginase 1 (gpASNase1) that was responsible for this antitumorigenic effect. Today, we know about a host of simpler organisms with similar enzymes, including bacteria and zebrafish. In fact, bacterial asparaginase is approved as a medicine to treat acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Because guinea pigs are mammals and thus have similar metabolisms to our own, the MIT researchers decided to use gpASNase1 to increase aspartate levels in tumors in four different tumor types and ask whether the tumors would grow faster. This was the case for three of the four types: The colon cancer cells, osteosarcoma cells, and mouse pancreatic cancer cells divided more rapidly than before, but the human pancreatic cancer cells continued to proliferate at their normal pace.

“This is a relatively small sample, but you could take this to mean that not every cell in the body is as sensitive to loss of aspartate production as others,” Sullivan says. “Acquiring aspartate may be a metabolic limitation for only a subset of cancers, since aspartate can be produced via a number of different pathways, not just through asparagine conversion.”

When the researchers tried to slow tumor growth using the antidiabetic metformin, the cells expressing gpASNase1 remained unaffected — confirming Sullivan’s prior suspicion that metformin slows tumor growth specifically by impeding cellular respiration and suppressing aspartate production.

“Our initial finding connecting metformin and proliferation was very serendipitous,” he says, “but these most recent results are a clear proof of concept. They show that decreasing aspartate levels also decreases tumor growth, at least in some tumors. The next step is to determine if there are other ways to more intentionally target aspartate synthesis in certain tissues and improve our current therapeutic approaches.”

Although the efficacy of using metformin to treat cancer remains controversial, these findings indicate that one means to target tumors would be to prevent them from accessing or producing nutrients like aspartate to make new cells.

“Although there are many limitations to cancer cell proliferation, which metabolites become limiting for tumor growth has been poorly understood,” says Kivanc Birsoy, the Chapman-Perelman Assistant Professor at Rockefeller University. “This study identifies aspartate as one such limiting metabolite, and suggests that its availability could be targeted for anti-cancer therapies.”

Birsoy is a former postdoc in professor of biology David Sabatini’s lab, who authored a paper published in the same issue of Nature Cell Biology, identifying aspartate as a major growth limitation in oxygen-deprived tumors.

“These companion papers demonstrate that some tumors in vivo are really limited by the chemical processes that require oxygen to get the aspartate they need to grow, which can affect their sensitivity to drugs like metformin,” Vander Heiden says. “We’re beginning to realize that understanding which cancer patients will respond to which treatments may be determined by factors besides genetic mutations. To really get the full picture, we need to take into account where the tumor is located, its nutrient availability, and the environment in which it lives.”

The research was funded by an NIH Pathway to Independence Award, the American Cancer Society, Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology Fund, the National Science Foundation, a National Institutes of Health Ruth Kirschstein Fellowship, Alex’s Lemonade Stand Undergraduate Research Fellowship, Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Faculty Scholar Award, Stand Up to Cancer, Lustgarten Foundation, Ludwig Center at MIT, the National Institutes of Health, and the Koch Institute’s Center for Precision Cancer Medicine.

Stem cell-derived zika model suggests mechanisms underlying microcephaly
Nicole Giese Rura | Whitehead Institute
June 21, 2018

Cambridge, MA  – Scientists turn to model organisms, like mice and yeast, to investigate the biology underlying emerging diseases. But for the Zika virus, the lack of a good model hampered this type of research. Now, a team of researchers in the laboratory of Whitehead Institute Founding Member Rudolf Jaenisch has devised a way to model Zika and other neural diseases in a dish. Their work is described this week in the journal PNAS.

The Zika virus was identified in 1947 in Uganda, but a 2013 epidemic in French Guinea first brought it to the public’s attention. As the disease spread throughout the Americas and the Caribbean in 2014, abnormalities, such as microcephaly in newborns, were increasingly reported when mothers were infected during their first trimester. Scientists’ efforts to better understand the virus and its mechanisms quickly hit a snag: mice, which are often used to model disease pathology, are not vulnerable to the Zika virus unless their innate immune defenses are knocked out. Additionally, neural diseases, such as those that cause microcephaly, affect cells that reside deep in the brain, and they cannot be easily accessed for observation and manipulation.

In order to circumvent these challenges and to model Zika in the lab, the researchers turned to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)–adult cells that have been pushed back to a embryonic stem cell-like state. iPSCs can in turn be nudged to mature into almost any cell type in the body. In previous work, Julien Muffat and Yun Li, former postdoctoral researchers in the Jaenisch lab, were the first to use iPSCs to create microglia, the specialized immune cells that maintain the brain and spinal cord and care for them after injury.

In the current work, Muffat and Li teamed up with Attya Omer, also a graduate student in the Jaenisch lab, and Lee Gehrke’s lab at MIT to study the effect of the Zika virus on iPSC-derived versions of three neural cell types critical during human fetal brain development: microglia, neural progenitors, and astrocytes. Whether the Zika virus can infect these cells and how well the cells can clear the virus could provide insight into why the virus can cause birth defects like microcephaly. Using their model, the team determined that after being infected with a strain derived from the initial Ugandan Zika virus, microglia can survive and can continue to harbor the virus. This is important because in a developing embryo, microglia move from the yolk sac to the developing brain very early in gestation. The study shows that, like their in vivo counterparts, iPSC-derived microglia could invade the immature neural tissue of a brain organoid, and pre-infected microglia could transfer the virus to the organoids. According to Muffat, this suggests that if microglial precursors are infected before their journey, they could shuttle the Zika virus to the developing brain and infect the neural progenitors residing there.

Neural progenitor cells, which during gestation produce the neurons and glia that constitute the majority of the human brain, are particularly vulnerable to the Zika virus and die when infected. To better understand why these cells are so susceptible, the team compared how the Zika virus and the closely related dengue virus affect the neural progenitor cells. Dengue, which does not cause birth defects like microcephaly, triggers a strong cellular immune response, called interferon, in the neural progenitors, which enables the progenitor cells to efficiently fight and clear the dengue virus. In sharp contrast, when exposed to the Zika virus, neural progenitors mount little if any interferon immune defense. Pretreating the neural progenitor cells with interferon before exposure to the Zika virus impedes the virus’s progression and proliferation, and reduces cell death. These results suggest that therapeutically altering interferon levels could prevent some of the more dire effects of Zika infection on the neural progenitor cells.

According to the team, using iPSC-derived cells has great potential for modeling Zika virus as well as many other diseases that affect the central nervous system.

This work was supported by the European Leukodystrophy Association, the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, the Simons Foundation (SFARI 204106), the International Rett Syndrome Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the National Institutes of Health (NIH grants HD 045022, R37-CA084198, AI100190), the ELA Foundation, the Emerald Foundation, and Biogen. Jaenisch is a cofounder of Fate Therapeutics, Fulcrum Therapeutics, and Omega Therapeutics.

Written by Nicole Giese Rura
***
Rudolf Jaenisch’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also a professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 ***
Full citation:
“Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Glial Cells and Neural Progenitors Display Divergent Responses to Zika and Dengue Infections”
PNAS, online June 18, 2018.
Julien Muffat (1,8), Yun Li (1,8), Attya Omer (1,8), Ann Durbin (3,4,5), Irene Bosch (3,4,5), Grisilda Bakiasi (6), Edward Richards (7), Aaron Meyer (7), Lee Gehrke (3,4,5), Rudolf Jaenisch (1,2).
1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
2. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 31 Ames Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
3. IMES, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
4. Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA
5. Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
6. Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA
7. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
8. These authors contributed equally
Decoding RNA-protein interactions

Scientists leverage one step, unbiased method to characterize the binding preferences of more than 70 human RNA-binding proteins.

Raleigh McElvery
June 7, 2018

Thanks to continued advances in genetic sequencing, scientists have identified virtually every A, T, C, and G nucleotide in our genetic code. But to fully understand how the human genome encodes us, we need to go one step further, mapping the function of each base. That is the goal of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project, funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and launched on the heels of the Human Genome Project in 2003. Although much has already been accomplished — mapping protein-DNA interactions and the inheritance of different epigenetic states — understanding the function of a DNA sequence also requires deciphering the purpose of the RNAs encoded by it, as well as which proteins bind to those RNAs.

Such RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate gene expression by controlling various post-transcriptional processes — directing where the RNAs go in the cell, how stable they are, and which proteins will be synthesized. Yet these vital RNA-protein relationships remain difficult to catalog, since most of the necessary experiments are arduous to complete and difficult to interpret accurately.

In a new study, a team of MIT biologists and their collaborators describes the binding specificity of 78 human RBPs, using a one-step, unbiased method that efficiently and precisely determines the spectrum of RNA sequences and structures these proteins prefer. Their findings suggest that RBPs don’t just recognize specific RNA segments, but are often influenced by contextual features as well — like the folded structures of the RNA in question, or the nucleotides flanking the RNA-binding sequence.

“RNA is never naked in the cell because there are always proteins binding, guiding, and modifying it,” says Christopher Burge, director of the Computational and Systems Biology PhD Program, professor of biology and biological engineering, extramural member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and senior author of the study. “If you really want to understand post-transcriptional gene regulation, then you need to characterize those interactions. Here, we take advantage of deep sequencing to give a more nuanced picture of exactly what RNAs the proteins bind and where.”

MIT postdoc Daniel Dominguez, former graduate student Peter Freese, and current graduate student Maria Alexis are the lead authors of the study, which is part of the ENCODE project and appears in Molecular Cell on June 7.

A method for the madness

From the moment an RNA is born, it is coated by RBPs that control nearly every aspect of its lifecycle. RBPs generally contain a binding domain, a three-dimensional folded structure that can attach to a specific nucleotide sequence on the RNA called a motif. Because there are over 1,500 different RBPs found in the human genome, the biologists needed a way to systematically determine which of those proteins bound to which RNA motifs.

After considering a number of different approaches to analyze RNA-protein interactions both directly in the cell (in vivo) and isolated in a test tube (in vitro), the biologists settled on an in vitro method known as RNA Bind-n-Seq (RBNS), developed four years ago by former Burge lab postdoc and co-author Nicole Lambert.

Although Lambert had previously tested only a small subset of proteins, RBNS surpassed other approaches because it was a quantitative method that revealed both low and high affinity RNA-protein interactions, required only a single procedural step, and screened nearly every possible RNA motif. This new study improved the assay’s throughput, systematically exploring the binding specificities of more than 70 human RBPs at a high resolution.

“Even with that initial small sample, it was clear RBNS was the way to go, and over the last three-and-a-half years we’ve been gradually building on this approach,” Dominguez says. “Since a single RBP can select from billions of unique RNA molecules, our approach gives you a lot more power to detect the all those possible targets, taking into account RNA secondary structure and contextual features. It’s an extremely deep and detailed assay.”

First, the researchers purified the human RBPs, mixing them with randomly-generated synthetic RNAs roughly 20 nucleotides long, which represented virtually all the RNAs an RBP could bind to. Next, they extracted the RBPs along with their bound RNAs and sequenced them. With the help of their collaborators from the University of California at San Diego and University of Connecticut Health, the team conducted additional assays to glean what these RNA-protein interactions might look like in an actual cell, and infer the cellular function of the RBPs.

The researchers expected most RBPs to bind to a unique RNA motif, but to their surprise they found the opposite: Many of the proteins, regardless of structural class, seemed to prefer similar short, unfolded nucleotide sequence motifs.

“Human cells express hundreds of thousands of distinct transcripts, so you might think that each RBP would bind a slightly different RNA sequence in order to distinguish between targets,” Alexis says. “In fact, one might assume that having distinct RBP motifs would ensure maximum flexibility. But, as it turns out, nature has built in substantial redundancy; multiple proteins seem to bind the same short, linear sequences.”

Redundant motifs with distinct targets and functions

This overlap in RBP binding preference suggested to the scientists that there must be some other indicator besides the sequence of the motif that signaled RBPs which RNA to target. Those signals, it turned out, stemmed from the spacing of the motifs as well as which nucleotide bases flank its binding sites. For the less common RBPs that targeted non-linear RNA sequences, the precise way the RNA folded also seemed to influence binding specificity.

The obvious question, then, is: Why might RBPs have evolved to rely on contextual features instead of just giving them distinct motifs?

Accessibility seems like one of the more plausible arguments. The researchers reasoned that linear RNA segments are physically easier to reach because they are not obstructed by other RNA strands, and they found that more accessible motifs are more likely to be bound. Another possibility is that having many proteins target the same motif creates some inter-protein competition. If one protein increases RNA stability and another decreases it, whichever binds the strongest will prevent the other from binding at all, enabling more pronounced changes in gene activity between cells or cell states. In other scenarios, proteins with similar functions that target the same motif could provide redundancy to ensure that regulation occurs in the cell.

“It’s definitely a difficult question, and one that we may never truly be able to answer,” Dominguez says. “As RBPs duplicated over evolutionary time, perhaps altering recognition of the contextual features around the RNA motif was easier than changing the entire RNA motif. And that would give new opportunities for RBPs to select different cellular targets.”

This study marks one of the first in vitro contributions to the ENCODE Project. While in vivo assays reveal information specific to the particular cell line or tissue in which they were conducted, RBNS will help define the basic rules of RNA-protein interactions — so fundamental they are likely to apply across many cell types and tissues.

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health ENCODE Project, an NIH/NIGMS grant, the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship, Kirschstein National Research Service Award, Burroughs Wellcome Postdoctoral Fund, and an NIH Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship.