Research Area: Cell Biology

An on-off switch for gene editing
Eva Frederick | Whitehead Institute
April 9, 2021

Now, in a paper published online in Cell on April 9, researchers describe a new gene editing technology called CRISPRoff that allows researchers to control gene expression with high specificity while leaving the sequence of the DNA unchanged. Designed by Whitehead Institute Member Jonathan Weissman, University of California San Francisco assistant professor Luke Gilbert, Weissman lab postdoc James Nuñez and collaborators, the method is stable enough to be inherited through hundreds of cell divisions, and is also fully reversible.

“The big story here is we now have a simple tool that can silence the vast majority of genes,” says Weissman, who is also a professor of biology at MIT and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “We can do this for multiple genes at the same time without any DNA damage, with great deal of homogeneity, and in a way that can be reversed. It’s a great tool for controlling gene expression.”

The project was partially funded by a 2017 grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to create a reversible gene editor. “Fast forward four years [from the initial grant], and CRISPRoff finally works as envisioned in a science fiction way,” says co-senior author Gilbert. “It’s exciting to see it work so well in practice.”

Genetic engineering 2.0

The classic CRISPR-Cas9 system uses a DNA-cutting protein called Cas9 found in bacterial immune systems. The system can be targeted to specific genes in human cells using a single guide RNA, where the Cas9 proteins create tiny breaks in the DNA strand. Then the cell’s existing repair machinery patches up the holes.

Because these methods alter the underlying DNA sequence, they are permanent. Plus, their reliance on “in-house” cellular repair mechanisms means it is hard to limit the outcome to a single desired change. “As beautiful as CRISPR-Cas9 is, it hands off the repair to natural cellular processes, which are complex and multifaceted,” Weissman says. “It’s very hard to control the outcomes.”

That’s where the researchers saw an opportunity for a different kind of gene editor — one that didn’t alter the DNA sequences themselves, but changed the way they were read in the cell.

This sort of modification is what scientists call “epigenetic” — genes may be silenced or activated based on chemical changes to the DNA strand. Problems with a cell’s epigenetics are responsible for many human diseases such as Fragile X syndrome and various cancers, and can be passed down through generations.

Epigenetic gene silencing often works through methylation — the addition of chemical tags to to certain places in the DNA strand — which causes the DNA to become inaccessible to RNA polymerase, the enzyme which reads the genetic information in the DNA sequence into messenger RNA transcripts, which can ultimately be the blueprints for proteins.

Weissman and collaborators had previously created two other epigenetic editors called CRISPRi and CRISPRa — but both of these came with a caveat. In order for them to work in cells, the cells had to be continually expressing artificial proteins to maintain the changes.

“With this new CRISPRoff technology, you can [express a protein briefly] to write a program that’s remembered and carried out indefinitely by the cell,” says Gilbert. “It changes the game so now you’re basically writing a change that is passed down through cell divisions — in some ways we can learn to create a version 2.0 of CRISPR-Cas9 that is safer and just as effective, and can do all these other things as well.”

Building the switch

To build an epigenetic editor that could mimic natural DNA methylation, the researchers created a tiny protein machine that, guided by small RNAs, can tack methyl groups onto specific spots on the strand. These methylated genes are then “silenced,” or turned off, hence the name CRISPRoff.

Because the method does not alter the sequence of the DNA strand, the researchers can reverse the silencing effect using enzymes that remove methyl groups, a method they called CRISPRon.

As they tested CRISPRoff in different conditions, the researchers discovered a few interesting features of the new system. For one thing, they could target the method to the vast majority of genes in the human genome — and it worked not just for the genes themselves, but also for other regions of DNA that control gene expression but do not code for proteins. “That was a huge shock even for us, because we thought it was only going to be applicable for a subset of genes,” says first author Nuñez.

Also, surprisingly to the researchers, CRISPRoff was even able to silence genes that did not have large methylated regions called CpG islands, which had previously been thought necessary to any DNA methylation mechanism.

“What was thought before this work was that the 30 percent of genes that do not have a CpG island were not controlled by DNA methylation,” Gilbert says. “But our work clearly shows that you don’t require a CpG island to turn genes off by methylation. That, to me, was a major surprise.”

CRISPRoff in research and therapy

To investigate the potential of CRISPRoff for practical applications, the scientists tested the method in induced pluripotent stem cells. These are cells that can turn into countless cell types in the body depending on the cocktail of molecules they are exposed to, and thus are powerful models for studying the development and function of particular cell types.

The researchers chose a gene to silence in the stem cells, and then induced them to turn into nerve cells called neurons. When they looked for the same gene in the neurons, they discovered that it had remained silenced in 90 percent of the cells, revealing that cells retain a memory of epigenetic modifications made by the CRISPRoff system even as they change cell type.

They also selected one gene to use as an example of how CRISPRoff might be applied to therapeutics: the gene that codes for Tau protein, which is implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. After testing the method in neurons, they were able to show that using CRISPRoff could be used to turn Tau expression down, although not entirely off.  “What we showed is that this is a viable strategy for silencing Tau and preventing that protein from being expressed,” Weissman says. “The question is, then, how do you deliver this to an adult? And would it really be enough to impact Alzheimer’s? Those are big open questions, especially the latter.”

Even if CRISPRoff does not lead to Alzheimer’s therapies, there are many other conditions it could potentially be applied to. And while delivery to specific tissues remains a challenge for gene editing technologies such as CRISPRoff, “we showed that you can deliver it transiently as a DNA or as an RNA, the same technology that’s the basis of the Moderna and BioNTech coronavirus vaccine,” Weissman says.

Weissman, Gilbert, and collaborators are enthusiastic about the potential of CRISPRoff for research as well.  “Since we now can sort of silence any part of the genome that we want, it’s a great tool for exploring the function of the genome,” Weissman says.

Plus, having a reliable system to alter a cell’s epigenetics could help researchers learn the mechanisms by which epigenetic modifications are passed down through cell divisions. “I think our tool really allows us to begin to study the mechanism of heritability, especially epigenetic heritability, which is a huge question in the biomedical sciences,” Nuñez says.

“Selfish” DNA helps bacteria cheat and grow in densely-packed microbial communities
Raleigh McElvery
March 12, 2021

Scientists have a term for genes that spread themselves throughout a population at any cost: “selfish” DNA. One way that these genes transmit through bacterial communities is via a type of bacterial sex called conjugation. When one bacterium makes contact with another, DNA from the host cell can be injected into a recipient cell.

Alan Grossman’s lab at the MIT Department of Biology studies a small but selfish chunk of DNA called ICEBs1. His group has identified several ways in which this so-called mobile genetic element actually benefits its host bacterium as it fights to spread. Building off this body of work, Grossman’s lab collaborated with colleagues at Tel Aviv University on a new study recently published in eLife. The international team found that ICEBs1 contains one gene in particular, which allows the host cell to continue dividing in densely-packed microbial communities. This helps the host to grow in conditions where nutrients are scarce, while also potentially helping ICEBs1 to propagate.

“Mobile genetic elements like ICEBs1 are found in the chromosomes of many different types of bacteria,” says Grossman, department head and co-senior author on the study. “Studying these elements — how they spread and how they affect their host cells — is critical for understanding the evolution of bacteria, engineering some types of bacteria to do useful things, and possibly preventing the deleterious effects caused by harmful bacteria.”

Like many DNA segments on the move, ICEBs1 includes genes that encode the molecular machinery required to transfer itself from one cell to the next. But mobile genetic elements can also contain “cargo” genes that bestow the host bacterium with new traits, such as antibiotic resistance. However, in many cases, the properties a cargo gene will endow are hard to predict.

“The host cell can get a lot of new genes in a hurry through mobile genetic elements like ICEBs1, and there’s a lot we still don’t know about the types of phenotypes cargo genes confer,” says the study’s first author, Joshua Jones PhD ’20. “The array of possible traits is probably a lot more diverse than we currently appreciate.”

To investigate the changes that ICEBs1 triggers in the host cell, Jones and colleagues examined large microbial communities called biofilms. These form when many bacteria aggregate on a surface and secrete a slimy “glue” made of sugar, proteins, and DNA that encases the population. Common examples of biofilms include dental plaque, the sludge that coats the inside of pipes, or the deleterious infections that form on surgical implants in patients’ bodies.

Because there are so many bacteria in close contact, biofilms are hot spots for exchanging mobile genetic elements like ICEBs1. However, secreting the materials needed to produce the slimy glue can rapidly deplete resources. As a result, bacteria in a biofilm do not always have the capacity to grow, divide, and potentially spread ICEBs1. Instead, certain types of rod-shaped bacteria begin to produce spores that are analogous to plant seeds. This process, called sporulation, enables these bacteria to become dormant and survive extreme conditions.

Jones found that Bacillus subtilis bacteria containing ICEBs1 were delayed in contributing to the biofilm glue, and also delayed in producing dormant spores. As a result, these bacteria could continue dividing for longer than bacteria without ICEBs1 — increasing the number of bacteria with ICEBs1 and the likelihood that ICEBs1 would spread. The researchers were able to pinpoint one ICEBs1 cargo gene in particular, called Development Inhibitor (devI), that triggered this delay in both biofilm development and sporulation.

“In a way, the cells with ICEBs1 are ‘cheating’ by delaying sporulation and not contributing to the greater good of the biofilm community,” Jones says. But, he explains, they can get away with it because the devI pathway only initiates when ICEBs1-containing cells are the minority in a microbial population. In order to spread as widely as possible, it’s best for ICEBs1 to transfer to new cells that don’t already contain existing copies. Furthermore, accumulating duplicate copies can have detrimental effects on ICEBs1 itself.

“It’s a very clever system for assessing the situation around the cell, and deciding whether it’s worthwhile for ICEBs1 to attempt to transfer,” Jones adds.

Next, the Grossman lab plans to determine precisely how devI exerts its effects on biofilm formation and sporulation. They suspect that other ICEBs1-like elements may also use genes analogous to devI to execute similar propagation strategies. Probing such “cheating” tactics orchestrated by selfish genes will help scientists better understand microbial evolution and, eventually, perhaps even inspire drugs to disrupt harmful biofilms, like those that form around surgical implants.

Members of MIT Biology came together with alumni, industry representatives, and supporters to review the department’s challenges and accomplishments.

March 9, 2021
Study reveals how egg cells get so big

Oocyte growth relies on physical phenomena that drive smaller cells to dump their contents into a larger cell.

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
March 10, 2021

Egg cells are by far the largest cells produced by most organisms. In humans, they are several times larger than a typical body cell and about 10,000 times larger than sperm cells.

There’s a reason why egg cells, or oocytes, are so big: They need to accumulate enough nutrients to support a growing embryo after fertilization, plus mitochondria to power all of that growth. However, biologists don’t yet understand the full picture of how egg cells become so large.

A new study in fruit flies, by a team of MIT biologists and mathematicians, reveals that the process through which the oocyte grows significantly and rapidly before fertilization relies on physical phenomena analogous to the exchange of gases between balloons of different sizes. Specifically, the researchers showed that “nurse cells” surrounding the much larger oocyte dump their contents into the larger cell, just as air flows from a smaller balloon into a larger one when they are connected by small tubes in an experimental setup.

“The study shows how physics and biology come together, and how nature can use physical processes to create this robust mechanism,” says Jörn Dunkel, an MIT associate professor of physical applied mathematics. “If you want to develop as an embryo, one of the goals is to make things very reproducible, and physics provides a very robust way of achieving certain transport processes.”

Dunkel and Adam Martin, an MIT associate professor of biology, are the senior authors of the paper, which appears this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The study’s lead authors are postdoc Jasmin Imran Alsous and graduate student Nicolas Romeo. Jonathan Jackson, a Harvard University graduate student, and Frank Mason, a research assistant professor at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, are also authors of the paper.

A physical process

In female fruit flies, eggs develop within cell clusters known as cysts. An immature oocyte undergoes four cycles of cell division to produce one egg cell and 15 nurse cells. However, the cell separation is incomplete, and each cell remains connected to the others by narrow channels that act as valves that allow material to pass between cells.

Members of Martin’s lab began studying this process because of their longstanding interest in myosin, a class of proteins that can act as motors and help muscle cells contract. Imran Alsous performed high-resolution, live imaging of egg formation in fruit flies and found that myosin does indeed play a role, but only in the second phase of the transport process. During the earliest phase, the researchers were puzzled to see that the cells did not appear to be increasing their contractility at all, suggesting that a mechanism other than “squeezing” was initiating the transport.

“The two phases are strikingly obvious,” Martin says. “After we saw this, we were mystified, because there’s really not a change in myosin associated with the onset of this process, which is what we were expecting to see.”

cluster of cells

Martin and his lab then joined forces with Dunkel, who studies the physics of soft surfaces and flowing matter. Dunkel and Romeo wondered if the cells might be behaving the same way that balloons of different sizes behave when they are connected. While one might expect that the larger balloon would leak air to the smaller until they are the same size, what actually happens is that air flows from the smaller to the larger.

This happens because the smaller balloon, which has greater curvature, experiences more surface tension, and therefore higher pressure, than the larger balloon. Air is therefore forced out of the smaller balloon and into the larger one. “It’s counterintuitive, but it’s a very robust process,” Dunkel says.

Adapting mathematical equations that had already been derived to explain this “two-balloon effect,” the researchers came up with a model that describes how cell contents are transferred from the 15 small nurse cells to the large oocyte, based on their sizes and their connections to each other. The nurse cells in the layer closest to the oocyte transfer their contents first, followed by the cells in more distant layers.

“After I spent some time building a more complicated model to explain the 16-cell problem, we realized that the simulation of the simpler 16-balloon system looked very much like the 16-cell network. It is surprising to see that such counterintuitive but mathematically simple ideas describe the process so well,” Romeo says.

The first phase of nurse cell dumping appears to coincide with when the channels connecting the cells become large enough for cytoplasm to move through them. Once the nurse cells shrink to about 25 percent of their original size, leaving them only slightly larger than their nuclei, the second phase of the process is triggered and myosin contractions force the remaining contents of the nurse cells into the egg cell.

“In the first part of the process, there’s very little squeezing going on, and the cells just shrink uniformly. Then this second process kicks in toward the end where you start to get more active squeezing, or peristalsis-like deformations of the cell, that complete the dumping process,” Martin says.

Cell cooperation

The findings demonstrate how cells can coordinate their behavior, using both biological and physical mechanisms, to bring about tissue-level behavior, Imran Alsous says.

“Here, you have several nurse cells whose job it is to nurse the future egg cell, and to do so, these cells appear to transport their contents in a coordinated and directional manner to the oocyte,” she says.

Oocyte and early embryonic development in fruit flies and other invertebrates bears some similarities to those of mammals, but it’s unknown if the same mechanism of egg cell growth might be seen in humans or other mammals, the researchers say.

“There’s evidence in mice that the oocyte develops as a cyst with other interconnected cells, and that there is some transport between them, but we don’t know if the mechanisms that we’re seeing here operate in mammals,” Martin says.

The researchers are now studying what triggers the second, myosin-powered phase of the dumping process to start. They are also investigating how changes to the original sizes of the nurse cells might affect egg formation.

The research was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, a Complex Systems Scholar Award from the James S. McDonnell Foundation, and the Robert E. Collins Distinguished Scholarship Fund.

Cells are known by the company they keep
Eva Frederick
March 2, 2021

In the paper, published online March 1 in the journal Cell Metabolism, researchers at Whitehead Institute and the Morgridge Institute for Research performed CRISPR-based genetic screens of cells cultured in either traditional media or a new physiologic medium previously designed in the Sabatini Lab at Whitehead Institute designed to more closely reflect the nutrient composition of human blood. The screen revealed that different genes became essential for survival and reproduction in the various conditions.

“This work underscores the importance of using more human-like, physiologically relevant media for culturing human cancer cell lines,” said Whitehead Institute Member and co-senior author David Sabatini, who is also a professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “The information we can learn from screens in human plasma-like media — or media designed to mimic other fluids throughout the body — may inform new therapeutic methods down the line.”

The widespread use of a human plasma-like medium could open the door for many researchers to conduct experiments in the lab that could have more relevance to human disease, but without complicated methods or prohibitive costs.

“Medium composition is both relatively accessible and quite flexible,” said co-senior author Jason Cantor, an Investigator at the Morgridge Institute for Research and an assistant professor of biochemistry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a former postdoc in Sabatini’s lab. “Not all researchers have access to specialized tissue culture incubators, nor can everyone easily pursue some of the more complex 3D and co-culture methods, but most can get their hands on a bottle of media.”

The big screen

The idea that different environmental conditions may lead to different genes being essential is not a new one. “People have done this in microorganisms, and shown that if you throw [bacteria] into different growth conditions — the contributions of different genes to cell fitness can change,” Cantor said.

With this reasoning in mind — that medium composition could affect which genes become necessary for human cells to grow — the researchers set up screens to identify essential genes in a single leukemia cell line in different kinds of culture media. One batch was grown in a traditional medium, and another cultured in the lab’s new medium called Human Plasma-Like Medium, or HPLM, which has a metabolic composition more reflective of that in human blood.

The approach they used — called a CRISPR screen —  takes advantage of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology to systematically snip and knock out genes across the genome, with the goal of creating a population of cells in which every possible gene knockout is represented. The expression of some genes is essential to survival, and cells grow substantially slower or die when those genes are deleted. Other cells may have trouble functioning, and some may grow even faster. Once the pooled cells have had a chance to grow and proliferate, researchers sequence the genetic material of the entire population to determine which genes were critical for survival within the given screen.

Once they completed the initial screens, the researchers identified hundreds of genes that were conditionally essential — that is, necessary for cell growth in one medium versus another. Interestingly, these medium-dependent essential genes collectively had roles in a number of different biological processes.

To determine how much these genes were dependent on the type of cells studied, the researchers then ran similar screens across a panel of human blood cancer cell lines, and then pursued follow-up work to understand why certain genes were identified as conditionally essential.

Ultimately, they uncovered the underlying gene-nutrient interactions, and specifically for these hit genes, traced the effects to availability of certain metabolites — the nutrients and small molecules necessary for metabolism — that are uniquely defined in HPLM versus the traditional media.

The next steps

CRISPR screens can help scientists identify potential drug targets and map out important cellular interactions to inform cancer therapies. “There are so many ways that people use CRISPR screens right now,” said Cantor. “What this study is showing is that the availability metabolites can have a major impact on which genes are important for cell growth, and so I think there are a lot of implications here in terms of how these types of screens could be performed in the future in order to potentially increase the fidelity of what we see in the lab and what might happen in the body.”

The research also establishes more nuanced relationships between cells’ genes and their environment. “What this allows us to do down the line, theoretically, is to tune how important a gene is — how important the encoded protein is — by manipulating metabolite levels in the blood,” said Cantor. “That’s one of our bigger-picture ideas.”

In the future, these relationships could inform cancer treatments. For example, if scientists could “tune” the importance of a specific gene for cancer cell growth, then the protein encoded by that gene could become a more promising drug target — in effect, tricking cancer cells into revealing possible context-dependent vulnerabilities. “The idea of targeting metabolites to treat cancer isn’t itself new — in fact, it [underlies] a well-established anti-cancer therapeutic enzyme still in use today — but I think our work maybe enables us to look for ways to couple this type of approach with other targeted therapies.”

“At our core, we are a basic cell biology lab,” added Nicholas Rossiter, a technician in Cantor’s lab and the first author of the study. “But whenever you’re studying basic cell biology, there’s the potential to translate it into therapeutic strategy. Our plan is just to keep on chugging along in our lab and studying how exactly cell biology can be influenced by these environmental factors. We do the basics, and then there will hopefully be some auspicious findings that can be carried on into therapeutics.”

Seychelle Vos investigates how the genome is organized so it can fit inside the cell — and how that careful organization affects gene expression.

February 24, 2021

The Davis and Berger labs combined cryo-electron microscopy and machine learning to visualize molecules in 3D.

February 4, 2021