Research Area: Genetics

“Runaway” Transcription

Researchers discover new rules governing bacterial gene expression that overturn fundamental assumptions about basic biological pathways.

Raleigh McElvery
August 26, 2020

On the evolutionary tree, humans diverged from yeast roughly one billion years ago. By comparison, two seemingly similar species of bacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, have been evolving apart for roughly twice as long. In other words: walking, talking bipeds are closer on the tree of life to single-celled fungus than these two bacteria are to one another. In fact, it’s becoming increasingly clear that what is true of one bacterial type may not be true of another — even when it comes down to life’s most basic biological pathways.

E. coli has served as a model organism in scientific research for over a century, and helped researchers parse many fundamental processes, including gene expression. In these bacteria, as one molecular machine, the RNA polymerase, moves along the DNA transcribing it into RNA, it is followed in close pursuit by a second molecular machine, the ribosome, which translates the RNA into proteins. This “coupled” transcription-translation helps monitor and tune RNA output, and is considered a hallmark of bacteria.

However, an interdisciplinary team of biologists and physicists recently showed that the B. subtilis bacterium employs a different set of rules. Rather than working in tandem with the ribosome, the polymerase in B. subtilis speeds ahead. This system of “runaway” transcription creates alternative rules for RNA quality control, and provides insights into the sheer diversity of bacterial species.

“Generations of researchers, including myself, were taught that coupled transcription-translation is fundamental to bacterial gene expression,” says Gene-Wei Li, an associate professor of biology and senior author of the study. “But our very precise, quantitative measurements have overturned that long-held view, and this study could be just the tip of the iceberg.”

Grace Johnson, a graduate student in the Department of Biology, and Jean-Benoît Lalanne, a graduate student in the Department of Physics, are the lead authors on the paper, which appeared in Nature on Aug. 26.

A curious clue

In 2018, Lalanne developed an experimental technique to measure the boundaries of RNA transcripts. When DNA is transcribed into RNA, the resulting transcripts are generally longer than the DNA coding sequence because they also have to include an extra bit at the end to signal the polymerase to stop. In B. subtilis, Lalanne noticed there simply wasn’t enough space between the ends of the coding sequences and the ends of the RNA transcripts — the extra code was too short for both the polymerase and the ribosome to fit at the same time. In this bacterium, coupled transcription-translation didn’t seem possible.

“It was a pretty weird observation,” Lalanne recalls. “It just didn’t square up with the accepted dogma.”

To delve further into these puzzling observations, Johnson measured the speeds of the RNA polymerase and ribosome in B. subtilis. She was surprised to find that they were moving at very different rates: the polymerase was going roughly twice as fast as the ribosome.

During coupled transcription-translation in E. coli, the ribosome is so closely associated with the RNA polymerase that it can control when transcription terminates. If the RNA encodes a “premature” signal for the polymerase to stop transcribing, the nearby ribosome can mask it and spur the polymerase on. However, if something goes awry and the ribosome is halted too far behind the polymerase, a protein called Rho can intervene to terminate transcription at these premature sites, halting the production of these presumably non-functional transcripts.

However, in B. subtilis, the ribosome is always too far behind the polymerase to exert its masking effect. Instead, Johnson found that Rho recognizes signals encoded in the RNA itself. This allows Rho to prevent production of select RNAs while ensuring it doesn’t suppress all RNAs. However, these specific signals also mean Rho likely has a more limited role in B. subtilis than it does in E. coli.

A family trait

To gauge how common runaway transcription is, Lalanne created algorithms that sifted through genomes from over 1,000 bacterial species to identify the ends of transcripts. In many cases, there was not enough space at the end of the transcripts for both the RNA polymerase and the ribosome to fit, indicating that more than 200 additional bacteria also rely on runaway transcription.

“It was striking to see just how widespread this phenomenon is,” Li says. “It raises the question: How much do we really know about these model organisms we’ve been studying for so many years?”

Carol Gross, a professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at University of California San Francisco who was not involved with the study, refers to the work as a “tour de force.”

“Gene-Wei Li and colleagues show transcription-translation coupling, thought to be a foundational feature of bacterial gene regulation, is not universal,” she says. “Instead, runaway transcription leads to a host of alternative regulatory strategies, thereby opening a new frontier in our study of bacterial strategies to thrive in varied environments.”

As researchers widen their experimental radius to include more types of bacteria, they are learning more about the basic biological processes underlying these microorganisms — with implications for those that take up residence in the human body, from helpful gut microbes to noxious pathogens.

“We’re beginning to realize that bacteria can have distinct ways of regulating gene expression and responding to environmental stress,” Johnson says. “It just shows how much interesting biology is left to uncover as we study increasingly diverse bacteria.”

Citation:
“Functionally uncoupled transcription–translation in Bacillus subtilis”
Nature, online August 26, 2020, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2638-5
Grace E. Johnson, Jean-Benoît Lalanne, Michelle L. Peters, and Gene-Wei Li

Top illustration: Researchers discovered a new system of transcription and translation in bacteria, where the polymerase (pink) in B. subtilis “runs away” from the ribosome (blue). Credit: Grace Johnson
Posted: 8.26.20
Bringing RNA into genomics

ENCODE consortium identifies RNA sequences that are involved in regulating gene expression.

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
July 29, 2020

The human genome contains about 20,000 protein-coding genes, but the coding parts of our genes account for only about 2 percent of the entire genome. For the past two decades, scientists have been trying to find out what the other 98 percent is doing.

A research consortium known as ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) has made significant progress toward that goal, identifying many genome locations that bind to regulatory proteins, helping to control which genes get turned on or off. In a new study that is also part of ENCODE, researchers have now identified many additional sites that code for RNA molecules that are likely to influence gene expression.

These RNA sequences do not get translated into proteins, but act in a variety of ways to control how much protein is made from protein-coding genes. The research team, which includes scientists from MIT and several other institutions, made use of RNA-binding proteins to help them locate and assign possible functions to tens of thousands of sequences of the genome.

“This is the first large-scale functional genomic analysis of RNA-binding proteins with multiple different techniques,” says Christopher Burge, an MIT professor of biology. “With the technologies for studying RNA-binding proteins now approaching the level of those that have been available for studying DNA-binding proteins, we hope to bring RNA function more fully into the genomic world.”

Burge is one of the senior authors of the study, along with Xiang-Dong Fu and Gene Yeo of the University of California at San Diego, Eric Lecuyer of the University of Montreal, and Brenton Graveley of UConn Health.

The lead authors of the study, which appears today in Nature, are Peter Freese, a recent MIT PhD recipient in Computational and Systems Biology; Eric Van Nostrand, Gabriel Pratt, and Rui Xiao of UCSD; Xiaofeng Wang of the University of Montreal; and Xintao Wei of UConn Health.

RNA regulation

Much of the ENCODE project has thus far relied on detecting regulatory sequences of DNA using a technique called ChIP-seq. This technique allows researchers to identify DNA sites that are bound to DNA-binding proteins such as transcription factors, helping to determine the functions of those DNA sequences.

However, Burge points out, this technique won’t detect genomic elements that must be copied into RNA before getting involved in gene regulation. Instead, the RNA team relied on a technique known as eCLIP, which uses ultraviolet light to cross-link RNA molecules with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) inside cells. Researchers then isolate specific RBPs using antibodies and sequence the RNAs they were bound to.

RBPs have many different functions — some are splicing factors, which help to cut out sections of protein-coding messenger RNA, while others terminate transcription, enhance protein translation, break down RNA after translation, or guide RNA to a specific location in the cell. Determining the RNA sequences that are bound to RBPs can help to reveal information about the function of those RNA molecules.

“RBP binding sites are candidate functional elements in the transcriptome,” Burge says. “However, not all sites of binding have a function, so then you need to complement that with other types of assays to assess function.”

The researchers performed eCLIP on about 150 RBPs and integrated those results with data from another set of experiments in which they knocked down the expression of about 260 RBPs, one at a time, in human cells. They then measured the effects of this knockdown on the RNA molecules that interact with the protein.

Using a technique developed by Burge’s lab, the researchers were also able to narrow down more precisely where the RBPs bind to RNA. This technique, known as RNA Bind-N-Seq, reveals very short sequences, sometimes containing structural motifs such as bulges or hairpins, that RBPs bind to.

Overall, the researchers were able to study about 350 of the 1,500 known human RBPs, using one or more of these techniques per protein. RNA splicing factors often have different activity depending on where they bind in a transcript, for example activating splicing when they bind at one end of an intron and repressing it when they bind the other end. Combining the data from these techniques allowed the researchers to produce an “atlas” of maps describing how each RBP’s activity depends on its binding location.

“Why they activate in one location and repress when they bind to another location is a longstanding puzzle,” Burge says. “But having this set of maps may help researchers to figure out what protein features are associated with each pattern of activity.”

Additionally, Lecuyer’s group at the University of Montreal used green fluorescent protein to tag more than 300 RBPs and pinpoint their locations within cells, such as the nucleus, the cytoplasm, or the mitochondria. This location information can also help scientists to learn more about the functions of each RBP and the RNA it binds to.

“The strength of this manuscript is in the generation of a comprehensive and multilayered dataset that can be used by the biomedical community to develop therapies targeted to specific sites on the genome using genome-editing strategies, or on the transcriptome using antisense oligonucleotides or agents that mediate RNA interference,” says Gil Ast, a professor of human molecular genetics and biochemistry at Tel Aviv University, who was not involved in the research.

Linking RNA and disease

Many research labs around the world are now using these data in an effort to uncover links between some of the RNA sequences identified and human diseases. For many diseases, researchers have identified genetic variants called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are more common in people with a particular disease.

“If those occur in a protein-coding region, you can predict the effects on protein structure and function, which is done all the time. But if they occur in a noncoding region, it’s harder to figure out what they may be doing,” Burge says. “If they hit a noncoding region that we identified as binding to an RBP, and disrupt the RBP’s motif, then we could predict that the SNP may alter the splicing or stability of the gene.”

Burge and his colleagues now plan to use their RNA-based techniques to generate data on additional RNA-binding proteins.

“This work provides a resource that the human genetics community can use to help identify genetic variants that function at the RNA level,” he says.

The research was funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute ENCODE Project, as well as a grant from the Fonds de Recherche de Québec-Santé.

Yukiko Yamashita

Education

  • PhD, 1999, Kyoto University
  • BS, Biology, 1994, Kyoto University

Research Summary

Two remarkable feats of multicellular organisms are generation of many distinct cell types via asymmetric cell division and transmission of the germline genome to the next generation, essentially in eternity. Studying these processes using the Drosophila male germline as a model system has led us to venture into new areas of study, such as functions of satellite DNA, a ‘genomic junk,’ and how they might be involved in speciation.

Awards

  • National Academy of Sciences, 2025
  • Tsuneko and Reiji Okazaki Award, 2016
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Investigator, 2014
  • MacArthur Fellow, 2011
  • Women in Cell Biology Early Career Award, American Society for Cell Biology, 2009
  • Searle Scholar, 2008
Ruth Lehmann

Education

  • Dr. rer. nat., 1985, University of Tübingen
  • MS, 1981, Biology, University of Freiburg

Research Summary

We study germ cells, the only cells in the body naturally able to generate completely new organisms. In addition to the nuclear genome, cytoplasmic information is passed though the egg cell to the next generation. We analyze the organization and regulation of germ line specific RNA-protein condensates, and explore mechanisms used by endosymbionts such as mitochondria and the intracellular bacterium, Wolbachia, to propagate through the cytoplasm of the female germ line.

Awards

  • Vanderbilt Prize in Biomedical Science, 2022
  • Gruber Genetics Prize, 2022
  • Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal, Genetics Society of America, 2021
  • Francis Amory Prize in Reproductive Medicine and Reproductive Physiology, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020
  • Vilcek Prize in Biomedical Science, 2020
  • Keith R. Porter Award, American Society for Cell Biology, 2018
  • Inaugural Klaus Sander Prize, German Society for Developmental Biology, 2017
  • European Molecular Biology Organization, Foreign Associate, 2012
  • Conklin Medal of the Society of Developmental Biology, 2011
  • National Academy of Sciences, Foreign Associate, 2005; Member, 2008
  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Member, 1998
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Investigator, 1990 and 1997
These muscle cells are guideposts to help regenerative flatworms grow back their eyes
Eva Frederick | Whitehead Institute
June 25, 2020

If anything happens to the eyes of the tiny, freshwater-dwelling planarian Schmidtea mediterranea, they can grow them back within just a few days. How they do this is a scientific conundrum — one that Peter Reddien’s lab at Whitehead Institute has been studying for years.

The lab’s latest project offers some insight: in a paper published in Science June 25, researchers in Reddien’s lab have identified a new type of cell that likely serves as a guidepost to help route axons from the eyes to the brain as the worms complete the difficult task of regrowing their neural circuitry.

Schmidtea mediterranea’s eyes are composed of light-capturing photoreceptor neurons connected to the brain with long, spindly processes called axons. They use their eyes to respond to light to help navigate their environment.

The worms, which are popular models for research into regeneration, can regrow pretty much any part of their body; eyes are an interesting part to study because regenerating the visual system requires the worms rewire their neurons to connect them to the brain.

When neural systems develop in embryos, the first nerve fibers, called pioneer axons, snake their way through tissue to form the circuitry needed to perceive and interpret external stimuli. The axons are helped along their way by specialized cells called guidepost cells. These special cells are positioned at choice points — places where the axon’s path could fork in different directions.

In many organisms, these guidepost cells aren’t a priority anymore once development is finished, and typically are not renewed through adulthood. That’s one reason why, when humans experience brain or nerve damage, the injury is usually permanent.

“This is a fundamental mystery of regeneration that we hadn’t even been thinking about,” says Reddien, the senior author of the paper who is also a professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “How can an adult animal regenerate a functional nervous system when the original development of the nervous system typically involves a number of cues that are thought to be transient?”

Then, in 2018, Reddien Lab scientist Lucila Scimone found something surprising in adult planarians: groups of mysterious cells that looked like they might play a role in guiding growing axons. She’d noticed this group of cells because they co-expressed two genes not often seen together and some were conspicuously close to the eyes.

“I was captivated by these cells,” she says. They appeared in very small numbers (a normal worm might have around 5; a large one might have up to 10) in every planarian she examined. They were divided into two distinct groups: some around the flatworms’ eyes, and others spaced out along the path to the brain center. When she traced the path of existing axons leading from the planarians’ eyes to their brain, they coincided with the positions of these cells without exception.

When the researchers characterized the cells, they found that they did not express any of the genes that are hallmarks of photoreceptor neurons; instead, they had markers often found in muscle tissue. “That was very striking, because muscle cells — that’s not what they do in most animals,” Scimone says.

In other organisms, guidepost cells are often neurons or glia. It would be unusual for muscle cells to serve as guideposts; but past work in the Reddien Lab had shown that planarian muscle cells played other special roles, such as secreting the extracellular matrix. The researchers now wondered whether they could add the role of guidepost to the long list of planarian muscle cell functions.

To test their hypothesis, the researchers designed a series of experiments. “We developed an eye transplantation method where you can take an eye from an animal and transplant it into another animal,” says Reddien Lab postdoc Kutay Deniz Atabay. “When you do this, the axonal projections from that eye will basically, if positioned appropriately, correctly wire themselves into the brain, producing a functional state.”

The researchers also created genetically engineered planarians that had the muscle cells, but no eyes, and then transplanted eyes onto their eyeless heads. Sure enough, the neurons grew as normal, snaking towards the cells and then adjusting their trajectories after encountering them.

Without the cells, it was a different story. When the researchers transplanted eyes to distant parts of planarians’ bodies without a population of these muscle cells, the photoreceptor neurons did not connect to the brain center. Likewise, when they transplanted eyes into planarians that had been modified to not have these muscle cells, their photoreceptor neurons still grew — but they did not wire properly to reach the brain.

These findings combined suggested that the cells were fully independent of the visual system — they did not form because of eyes or photoreceptor neurons, but likely established themselves before the neurons grew — which provided more evidence for the guidepost role.

The guidepost-like activity of these cells then begged the question: how do the cells themselves know where to be? “We found that there’s a pattern of signaling molecules in muscle that is setting where these cells should be,” Reddien says. “If we perturb the global positional information of the system, these cells get placed in the wrong positions, and then axons go to the wrong positions — so we think there’s a positional information framework that places the cells during regeneration, and that allows them to work as guideposts in the correct locations.”

At this point, the researchers don’t know exactly how the cells are able to communicate with growing axons to serve as guideposts. They could be releasing some sort of signaling molecule that attracts the axons, or they could be communicating by using trans-membrane proteins.

“That will be an exciting direction for the future,” Reddien says. “We have now identified the transcriptome for the cells, which means we know all the genes that these cells express. That provides us with an intriguing list of genes that can be probed functionally, to try to see which ones are mediating the functions of these cells.”

This study is a step forward in a body of work that aims to expand the capabilities of regenerative medicine. “Imagine a scenario where someone experiences a spinal cord injury or an eye injury or stroke that leads to the loss of a neural circuit,” says Atabay. “The reason we can’t fully cure these cases today is that we lack fundamental information regarding how these systems can regenerate. Looking at regenerative organisms provides a lot of insights. From this case, we see that regenerating the lost system may not be enough; you may also need to regenerate systems that are properly patterning that system.”

***

Written by Eva Frederick

***

Scimone, M. L. et al. “Muscle and neuronal guidepost-like cells facilitate planarian visual system regeneration.” Science, June 25, 2020.

3 Questions with Seychelle Vos

An unconventional geneticist uses cryogenic electron microscopy and crystallography to understand gene expression and cell fate.

Lucy Jakub
June 1, 2020

Seychelle Vos arrived in September 2019 as the Department of Biology’s newest assistant professor. Her lab in Building 68 uses cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), X-ray crystallography, biochemistry, and genetics to study how DNA and its associated proteins are organized inside the cell. Vos received her PhD from the University of California at Berkeley and completed her postdoctoral research at the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry in Germany. She sat down to discuss her structural biology research, and why it’s so important to understand DNA as a physical structure.

Q: Your research is on the proteins that compress DNA so it can fit inside a cellular organelle called the nucleus. How does the genome organize itself in different shapes to perform different functions in the cell, and why is this an important process for us to understand?

A: If we take all the DNA inside of one human cell and stretch it out end to end, it extends 2 meters in length. But it needs to fit into the nucleus, which is only a few microns wide. It’s essentially like stringing a fishing line from here to New Haven and trying to put it in a soccer ball. That’s not an easy thing to do. There are lots of proteins that compact the genome either by wrapping the DNA around themselves or by forming loops in the DNA.

In order to replicate DNA or transcribe it to make a protein, the cell’s molecular machinery needs to be able to access and read it. Depending on how the DNA is wrapped and organized, different genes will be more accessible than others. In a stem cell, essentially any gene can be turned on. But as cells begin to differentiate into kidney cells, liver cells, and so on, only the genes specific to those functions can be turned on. Every cell has its own set of proteins that make it special, and most of that regulation happens at the level of RNA expression.

Our lab wants to understand how DNA organization impacts gene expression at the atomic level. This gets to the crux of how a stem cell becomes a specific cell type, and what happens when those programs go wrong. Without the right kind of compaction you can have cancer phenotypes, because things get turned on that shouldn’t be, or a cell thinks it’s a stem cell again and divides really fast. Many of the proteins we study are involved either in developmental disorders or cancers. If we don’t understand their basic biology, it’s very hard to come up with reasonable ways of treating these diseases.

Q: What was it about structural biology that hooked you during your early career?

A: When I started my PhD at UC Berkeley, I didn’t have much of an interest in structural biology. I thought that I wanted to study the immunology of nucleic acids, and I did my first lab rotation with Jennifer Doudna, one of the biochemists who was instrumental in developing CRISPR-Cas9 as a gene-editing tool. She might seem like a funny first person to do a rotation with if you were doing immunology, but CRISPR is essentially a bacterial immune system, and I went to her lab just to see a completely different way of viewing immunology. During that rotation, I fell in love with crystallography. What’s so beautiful about this technique is that it shows us how different atoms are communicating with each other, and how one molecule might be engaging with another molecule.

For the rest of my rotations as a graduate student, I did research in biochemistry and structural biology labs, and ended up joining James Berger’s lab, which did a combination of both. I worked on a class of enzymes called topoisomerases that bind to DNA and uncoil the DNA when it gets tangled. I was able to solve a number of very interesting structures, and do biochemistry and genetics all at the same time.

During my postdoc I studied RNA polymerase II, the enzyme that makes all the RNAs that turn into proteins in the cell and determine the cell’s identity. I wanted to know how it is regulated after the initiation stage of transcription. One of the proteins I was working with wouldn’t crystallize, and we had to come up with some other ways of seeing it. So we turned to cryo-EM, which had just become a very high-resolution technology — we could actually see the atoms touching each other! That was a game-changer for me. If you told me at the beginning of my PhD that these technologies could become central to my research, I would have told you there’s no way that would happen. But life has surprises.

Q: How does your expertise in genetics and biochemistry help you solve structural problems?

A: I’m definitely not your average structural biologist — I use structural tools to advance the genetics I want to do. My lab uses genetics to inform which protein complexes we want to look at, and then we use cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography to understand how those proteins actually affect RNA polymerase II. With what we learn about the structure, we can go back and use targeted genetic approaches to remove those proteins from the genome and see what happens to gene expression in particular cells. I also have projects where we’ll do a genetic screen first, and then use structural biology and chemistry techniques to get more information. The research is like a giant feedback loop. You need all of those perspectives to really understand the whole system.

Making medicine runs in the family
Greta Friar | Whitehead Institute
May 5, 2020

What do the painkillers morphine and codeine, the cancer chemotherapy drug vinblastine, the popular brain health supplement salidroside, and a plethora of other important medicines have in common? They are all produced in plants through processes that rely on the same family of enzymes, the aromatic amino acid decarboxylases (AAADs). Plants, which have limited ability to physically react to their environments, have instead evolved to produce a stunning array of chemicals that allow them to do things like deter pests, attract pollinators, and adapt to changing environmental conditions. A lot of these molecules have also turned out to be useful in medicine—but it’s unusual for one family of enzymes to be responsible for so many different molecules of importance to both plants and humans. New research from Whitehead Institute Member Jing-Ke Weng, who is also an associate professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and postdoctoral researcher Michael Torrens-Spence delves into the science behind the AAADs’ unusual generative capacity.

Plants create their useful molecules through biochemical pathways made up of chains of enzymes. Each enzyme acts as an assembly worker, taking in a molecule—starting with a basic building block like an amino acid—and performing biochemical modifications in sequence. The altered molecules get passed down the line until the last enzyme creates the final natural product. Once the pathway enzymes for a molecule of interest have been identified, researchers can copy their corresponding genes into organisms like yeast and bacteria that are capable of producing the molecules at scale more easily than the original plants. The AAAD family of enzymes function as gatekeepers to plants’ specialized molecule production because they operate at the beginning of many of the enzyme assembly lines; they take various amino acids, molecules that are widely available in nature, and direct them into different enzymatic pathways that produce unique molecules that only exist in plants. When an AAAD evolves to perform a new function, as has occurred frequently in their evolutionary history, this change high up in the assembly lines can cascade into the development of new biochemical pathways that create new natural products—leading to the diversity of medicines that stem from AAAD-gated pathways.

Due to the AAADs’ prominent role in the production of medically important molecules, Weng and Torrens-Spence decided to investigate how the AAADs came to be so prolific. In research published in the journal PNAS on May 5, the researchers illuminate the structural and functional underpinnings of the AAADs’ diversity. They also demonstrate how their detailed knowledge of the enzymes can be used to engineer novel enzymatic pathways to produce important molecules of interest from plants.

“We characterized these enzymes very thoroughly, which is a great starting place for manipulating the system and engineering it to do something new. That’s particularly exciting when you’re dealing with enzymes at the interface between primary and specialized plant metabolism; it can apply to a lot of downstream drugs,” Torrens-Spence says.

The AAAD family evolved from one ancestral enzyme into a diverse set of related enzymes over a relatively short period of time. This sort of diversification occurs when an enzyme gets accidentally duplicated, after which one copy has evolutionary pressure on it to maintain the same function, but the other copy suddenly has free range to evolve. If the superfluous enzyme mutates to do something new that is useful to the organism, from then on both enzymes, with their distinct roles, are likely to be maintained. In the case of the AAADs, this process occurred many times, leading to a large number of enzymes that appear almost exactly alike, yet can do very different things.

In order to explain the AAADs’ successful rate of diversification, the researchers took a close look at four enzymes in the AAAD family with different roles, and discovered the composition and three-dimensional shape—the crystal structure—of each. The crystal structure allowed the researchers to see how these molecular machines hold and modify specific molecules; this meant that they could understand why some AAADs initiate certain specialized-molecule production lines while other AAADs initiate alternative production lines. The researchers next used genetics and biochemistry to pinpoint the differences between the enzymes and how small genetic variations enact very major changes to the enzyme’s underlying machinery. This detailed analysis explained, among others things, how a subset of enzymes that evolved out of the AAADs, the aromatic acetaldehyde synthases (AASs), came to perform a completely different action on molecules while still being so similar to true AAADs that the two types of enzymes are often mistaken for each other.

After the researchers developed this thorough understanding of the AAAD family of enzymes, as well as knowledge of the AAAD-containing pathways that create useful medicinal molecules, they applied this knowledge by engineering an entirely new pathway to create a molecule of interest, (S)-norcoclaurine, a precursor molecule for morphine and other poppy-based painkillers. Torrens-Spence combined enzymes from pathways in different species to invent a novel chain of enzyme reactions that can produce (S)-norcoclaurine in fewer steps than is seen in nature. This experiment was a proof of concept that Torrens-Spence says shows the potential for such biosynthetic engineering, for example as a method to produce plant-based drugs more easily.

“Often with these molecules of interest, you figure out the pathway in plants and copy-paste it into a more scalable system, like yeast, that will produce larger quantities of the molecule,” Torrens-Spence says. “Here we’re applying engineering principles to biology, so that we can innovate and build something new.”

Written by Greta Friar

***

Jing-Ke Weng’s primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also an associate professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

***

Citation:

“Structural basis for divergent and convergent evolution of catalytic machineries in plant aromatic amino acid decarboxylase proteins”

PNAS, May 5, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920097117

Michael P. Torrens-Spence (1), Ying-Chih Chiang (2†), Tyler Smith (1,3), Maria A. Vicent (1,4), Yi Wang (2), and Jing-Ke Weng (1,3)

1 Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

2 Department of Physics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.

3 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

4 Department of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA.

† Present address: School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Harnessing the moonseed plant’s chemical know-how
Eva Frederick | Whitehead Institute
April 20, 2020

In overgrown areas from Canada to China, a lush, woody vine with crescent-shaped seeds holds the secret to making a cancer-fighting chemical. Now, Whitehead Institute researchers in Member Jing-Ke Weng’s lab have discovered how the plants do it.

Plants in the family Menispermaceae, from the Greek words “mene” meaning “crescent moon,” and “sperma,” or seed, have been used in the past for a variety of medicinal purposes. Native Americans used the plants to treat skin diseases, and would ingest them as a laxative. Moonseed was also used as an ingredient in curare, a muscle relaxant used on the tips of poison arrows.

But the plants also may have a use in modern-day medicine: a compound called acutumine shown to have anti-cancer properties (although not tested specifically against cancer cells, the chemical has been shown to kill human T-cells, an important quality for leukemia and lymphoma treatments). Acutumine is a halogenated product, which means the molecule is capped on one end by a halogen atom — a group that includes fluorine, chlorine and iodine, among others. In this case, the halogen is chlorine.

Halogenated compounds like acutumine can be useful in medicinal chemistry — their unusual chemical appendages mean they react in interesting ways with other biomolecules, and drug designers can put them to use in creating compounds to complete specific tasks in the body. Today, 20% of pharmaceutical compounds are halogenated. “However, chemists’ ability to efficiently install halogen atoms to desirable positions of starting compounds has been quite limited,” Weng says.

Most natural halogenated products come from microorganisms such as algae or bacteria, and acutumine is one of the only halogenated products made by plants. Chemists finally succeeded in synthesizing the compound in 2009, although the reaction is time-consuming and expensive (10 mg of synthesized acutumine can cost around $2,000).

Colin Kim, a graduate student in the Weng lab at Whitehead Institute, wanted to know how these plants were completing this tricky reaction using only their own genetic material. “We thought, why don’t we ask how the plants make it and then upscale the reaction [to produce it more efficiently]?” Kim says.

“By understanding how living organisms such as the moonseed plant perform chemically challenging halogenation chemistry, we could devise new biochemical approaches to produce novel halogenated compounds for drug discovery,” Weng says.

Kim knew that for every halogenated molecule in an organism, there is an enzyme called a halogenase that catalyzes the reaction that sticks on that halogen. Halogenases are useful in creating pharmaceuticals – a well-placed halogen can help fine-tune the bioactivities of various drugs. So Weng, who is also an associate professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Kim, who spearheaded the project, began working to identify the helper molecule responsible for creating acutumine in moonseed plants.

First, the scientists obtained three species of Menispermaceae plants. Two of them, common moonseed (Menispermum canadense) and Chinese moonseed (Sinomenium acutum), were known to produce acutumine. They also procured one plant in the same family called snake vine (Stephania japonica) which did not produce the compound.

They began their investigation by using mass spectrometry to look for acutumine in all three plants, and then find out exactly where in the plants it was located. They found the chemical all throughout the first two — and some extra in the roots of common moonseed. As expected, the third plant, snake vine, had none, and could therefore be used as a reference species, since presumably it would not ever express the gene for the halogenase enzyme that could stick on the chlorine molecule.

Next, the researchers started searching for the gene. They began by sequencing the RNA that was being expressed in the plants (RNA serves as a messenger between genomic DNA and functional proteins), and created a huge database of RNA sorted by what tissue it had been identified in.

At this point, the extra acutumine in the roots of common moonseed came in handy. The researchers had some idea of what the enzyme might look like – past research on other halogenases in bacteria suggested that one specific family of enzyme, called Fe(II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent halogenases, or 2ODHs, for short, was capable of site-specifically adding a halogen in the same way that the moonseed’s mystery enzyme did. Although no 2ODHs had yet been found in plants, the researchers thought this lead was worth a look. So they searched specifically for transcripts similar to 2ODH sequences that were more highly expressed in the roots of common moonseed than in the leaves and stems.

After analyzing the RNA transcripts, Kim and Weng were pretty sure they had found what they were looking for: one gene in particular (which they named McDAH, short for M. canadense dechloroacutumine halogenase) was highly expressed in the roots of common moonseed. Then, in Chinese moonseed, they identified another protein that shared 99.1 percent of McDAH’s sequence, called SaDAH. No similar protein was found in snakevine, suggesting that this protein was likely the enzyme they wanted.

To be sure, the researchers tested the enzyme in the lab, and found that it was indeed the first-ever plant 2ODH, able to stick on the chlorine molecule to the alkaloid molecule dechloroacutumine to form acutumine. Interestingly, the enzyme was pretty picky; when they gave it other alkaloids like codeine and berberine to see if it would install a halogen on those as well, the enzyme ignored them, suggesting it was highly specific toward its preferred substrate, dechloroacutumine, the precursor of acutumine. They compared the enzyme’s activity to other similar enzymes, and found the key to its ability lay in the substitution of one specific amino acid in the active site– aspartic acid — for a glycine.

Now that they had identified the enzyme responsible for the moonseed’s halogenation reactions, Kim and Weng wanted to see what else it could do. A chemical capable of catalyzing such a complex reaction might be useful for chemists trying to synthesize other compounds, they hypothesized.

So they presented the enzyme with some dechloroacutumine and a whole buffet of alternative anions to see whether it might catalyze a reaction with any of these molecules in lieu of chlorine. Of the selection of anions, including bromide, azide, and nitrogen dioxide, the enzyme catalyzed a reaction only with azide, a construct of 3 nitrogen atoms.

“That is super cool, because there isn’t any other naturally occurring azidating enzyme that we know of,” Kim says. The enzyme could be used in click chemistry, a nature-inspired method to create a desired product through a series of simple, easy reactions.

In future studies, Weng and Kim hope to use what they’ve learned about the McDAH and SaDAH enzymes as a starting point to create enzymes that can be used as tools in drug development. They’re also interested in using the enzyme on other plant products to see what happens. “Plant natural products, even without chlorines, are pretty effective and bioactive, so it would be cool to see if you can take those plant natural products and then install chlorines to see what kind of changes and bioactivity it has, whether it develops new-to-nature functions or retain its original bioactivity with enhanced properties,” Kim says. “It expands the biocatalytic toolbox we have for natural product biosynthesis and its derivatization.”

***

Written by Eva Frederick

***

Citation: Kim, Colin Y. et al. The chloroalkaloid (−)-acutumine is biosynthesized via a Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent halogenase in Menispermaceae plants. Nature Communications. April 20, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15777-w

Exploring How Cells Repair and Tolerate DNA Damage
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
March 2, 2020

Graham Walker, Ph.D., studies the processes cells use to repair and tolerate DNA damage from environmental pollutants. For more than 40 years, he has worked to understand how cells respond to DNA damage, and how these processes can introduce mutations that lead to cancer and other human diseases.

His current NIEHS-funded work focuses on translesion synthesis (TLS). This damage tolerance process allows specialized enzymes that copy DNA, called TLS DNA polymerases, to replicate past lesions in damaged DNA. The process can help cells tolerate environmental DNA damage, but because TLS polymerases frequently insert the wrong DNA base, they can also lead to DNA mutations.

“The TLS process is critically important to human health because it helps cells survive DNA damage, but it can come at a cost,” said Walker. “It isn’t the kind of repair system you would think we would want because it makes a lot of mistakes. However, as we drill into these details, we are finding that there is so much more to be learned than just the strict biochemistry.”

In 2017, Walker was one of eight environmental health scientists to receive an inaugural Revolutionizing Innovative, Visionary Environmental Health Research (RIVER) Outstanding Investigator Award from NIEHS. The grant, which funds researchers rather than specific projects, provides Walker with flexibility to explore novel directions in his research.

From the Ames Test to TLS

Walker was drawn into the world of DNA repair and mutagenesis as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Berkeley, under the guidance of Bruce Ames, Ph.D. Ames’ group created the Ames test, still used today, to determine whether a given chemical is likely to cause cancer. The Ames test uses bacterial strains that include a derivative of a naturally occurring drug-resistant plasmid, a small circular DNA molecule, known as pKM101. This molecule significantly increases the mutation rate of bacterial genes in response to chemical exposures, playing an important role in this quick and convenient test to estimate carcinogenic potential.

“I decided there must be something really interesting on that plasmid because it led to much higher mutation rates in bacteria for the same amount of damage,” said Walker.

After arriving at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, his current employer, Walker continued to study the mechanisms behind these mutations.

Walker and his research team discovered the specific genes of pKM101 that are needed for it to produce more mutations. They showed that these genes are orthologs, or genes that evolved from a common ancestral gene, in the Escherichia coli (E. coli) chromosome that are required for the bacteria to mutate in response to DNA damage. This work helped lay the groundwork for the discovery of TLS DNA polymerases and how they are controlled.

“When we first sequenced these genes, nothing like them had been previously reported, but subsequently more and more related genes were discovered in all domains of life,” said Walker. “After decades of work by many labs, we now know that these are all TLS DNA polymerases and that the pKM101 plasmid encodes a polymerase that is responsible for the increased mutations.”

Using Bacteria to Understand DNA Damage

Walker’s prior research on the mutagenesis-enhancing function of pKM101 also led him to analyze E. coli’s SOS system, a set of biological responses that are activated to rescue cells from severe DNA damage. Walker and his team identified genes turned on by DNA damage that are regulated as part of E. coli’s SOS response. Many of the genes encode functions involved in DNA repair or mutagenesis. This work on the SOS response of E. coli was the first to directly demonstrate, in any organism, that DNA damage from environmental sources can change gene expression.

By further exploring TLS DNA polymerases in E. coli, he also identified the biological role of one of the most conserved DNA-damage response enzymes, DinB, which encodes a TLS DNA polymerase, and reported that the gene is required for resistance to some DNA-damaging agents. His work on DinB also suggested an additional mechanism by which antibiotics can become toxic to bacterial cells.

Blocking TLS in Cancer

“While a postdoc in the mid 1970’s with Bruce Ames, my ambitious hope was that by studying pKM101, I would learn something about the fundamental mechanism of how mutations arose in bacteria and humans, and might even learn how to control it,” said Walker. “That is now happening with my current, NIEHS-funded work.”

Some tumors can withstand damage from chemotherapy drugs by relying on TLS, which allows them to survive by replicating past damaged DNA caused by the drugs. In eukaryotes, including humans, mutagenic TLS is carried by two TLS DNA polymerases known as Rev1 and Pol zeta.

In addition to his innovative research, Walker is devoted to improving education and helping undergraduate students. In 2002, Walker became a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor and used his funding to establish a science education group modeled on his laboratory research group.

“I feel that training the next generations of scientists is as important as the science itself, and I have been incredibly lucky to have a spectacular set of grad students and post docs work with me over the years,” said Walker. “I have tried to focus as much on training, through teaching and mentoring, as on advancing the science.”

“Not only are these TLS polymerases responsible for introducing a lot of mutations that cause cancer, they also help cancer cells survive in the face of chemotherapy drugs that introduce DNA damage that would otherwise kill them,” said Walker.

Recently, Walker and his colleagues discovered that a small molecule and compound known as JH-RE-06 can block the Rev1-Pol zeta mutagenic TLS pathway by interfering with the ability of the Rev1 domain to recruit Pol zeta. The researchers tested the molecule in human cancer cell lines and showed that it enhanced the ability of several different types of chemotherapy to kill cancer cells, while also suppressing their ability to mutate in the presence of DNA-damaging drugs. In a mouse model of human melanoma, they found that not only did the tumors stop growing in mice treated with a combination of the chemotherapy drug cisplatin and JH-RE-06, those mice also survived longer.

“I am able to take more chances and try more high-risk experiments with the RIVER award,” said Walker. “The flexibility and extra resources are now allowing me to identify TLS inhibitors, which are offering startlingly unexpected mechanistic insights and also show potential to improve chemotherapy.”

Researchers discover an RNA-related function for a DNA repair enzyme
Raleigh McElvery
February 26, 2020

After decades of speculation, researchers have demonstrated that a classical DNA repair enzyme also binds to RNA, affecting blood cell development.

The DNA-dependent protein kinase, otherwise known as DNA-PK, is one of the most important enzymes that binds DNA and repairs double-stranded breaks. This mode of repair is essential for generating receptors that help the immune system fight off intruders. But DNA-PK doesn’t just bind DNA; it also binds RNA. Although researchers have known this for decades, they didn’t fully understand what kinds of RNAs DNA-PK bound in mammalian cells, or the physiological consequences of this binding.

In a new study published on February 26 in Nature, researchers from MIT and Columbia University have uncovered a mechanism whereby DNA-PK binds to the RNA involved in ribosome assembly. Ribosomes — the cell’s protein synthesis machinery — ensure that stem cells give rise to enough red blood cells. The researchers found that mutating DNA-PK prevents the ribosomes from being built properly, which prevents blood cells from doing their job and leads to blood disorders.

“This is the first biochemical evidence of DNA-PK assembly and activation by RNA inside cells,” says Eliezer Calo, a co-senior author and assistant professor in MIT’s Department of Biology. “We’re still trying to determine the mechanisms that regulate protein synthesis in stem cells, and this study reveals one of them.”

Co-senior author, Shan Zha from Columbia University, had previously studied DNA-PK’s role in DNA repair by generating a mouse model that carried enzymatically-dead versions of DNA-PK. While using this model to investigate tumorigenesis, Zha’s lab found these mutant mice developed a form of blood cancer known as myeloid disease. At the same time, another research group showed that mutations in DNA-PK also led to anemia, which occurs when the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells

Neither myeloid disease nor anemia could be easily explained by DNA repair defects alone. However, the two blood disorders did share some similarities to diseases caused by ribosome defects. Because DNA-PK resides in the same organelle where ribosomes are made, the Zha and Calo labs began to wonder whether DNA-PK could bind to the RNA there and control ribosome biogenesis.

In this new study, the Zha lab found that DNA-PK mutations impaired protein translation in red blood cell progenitors, which might contribute to anemia. In parallel, the Calo lab was investigating ribosomal RNA processing and was surprised to find that DNA-PK seemed to be implicated in ribosome assembly. The Calo lab then mapped all the RNAs in cells that bind DNA-PK. The enzyme unexpectedly attached to U3, a small RNA that helps assemble one of the subunits comprising the ribosome. Once it binds U3, DNA-PK can transfer a phosphate group to several specific sites on one of its own subunits. If DNA-PK is defective and cannot transfer the phosphate group, protein synthesis in blood stem cells is impaired, eventually causing anemia.

DNA-PK is essential for cellular viability in nearly all human cell lines, including cancer cell lines, while many other proteins involved in same DNA repair pathway are dispensable. Several studies, including one published by the Zha lab, showed that DNA-PK protein levels are 50-fold higher in common human cell lines than in rodent cell lines. The researchers do not yet know why the enzyme is so critical, but they suspect it might have to do with its ability to bind RNA. “We are interested in exploring whether this new role for DNA-PK could provide clues to this puzzle,” Zha says.

Calo says their findings could also have important implications for cancer treatment, because DNA-PK has emerged as a promising target for cancer therapy. Drugs that inhibit DNA-PK could prevent cancer cells from repairing their DNA and replicating successfully, but he warns these same remedies could also impact stem cell function. The next step is to explore DNA-PK’s other RNA binding targets and the related molecular pathways.

“We’ve demonstrated that DNA-PK has an entirely separate role that has nothing to do with DNA repair,” Calo says. “In the future, we’re excited to learn what additional RNA-related duties it may have beyond stem cell maintenance.”

Top Image: Ribosomes are assembled in the nucleoli (shown here in human cells).

Citation:
“DNA-PKcs has KU-dependent function in rRNA processing and haematopoiesis”
Nature, online February 26, 2020, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2041-2
Zhengping Shao, Ryan A. Flynn, Jennifer L. Crowe, Yimeng Zhu, Jialiang Liang, Wenxia Jiang, Fardin Aryan, Patrick Aoude, Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Verna M. Estes, Brian J. Lee, Govind Bhagat, Shan Zha, and Eliezer Calo